Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

A unified unsupervised framework of multi-modal image super resolution and fusion via implicit neural representation

Sep 2026 · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · 45 references
Advanced Image Processing Techniques Advanced Image Fusion Techniques

Abstract

With the rise of dual-mode therapy and imaging, it is still challenging to accurately and precisely monitor structural organs during therapy. We present a self-supervised implicit neural representation (INR) framework to solve multi-modal image super resolution (MIR) and image fusion (MIF) for image guidance in therapy. In the purpose of preserving features and removing redundancy from the previously scanned images and therapeutic response, the common and unique features are represented respectively by means of segmented-based hash-grid sparse coding. The advantage is that only useful information is preserved while interfering information is discarded. Furthermore, the self-supervised optimization allows effectively training the multi-modal sparse coding INR network in the absence of ground truth. Extensive experiments are carried out on ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. In MIR task, our method achieves at least 4–7% structural similarity index measure (SSIM) improvement and 1–2% peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) gain across all datasets, while learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS) decreases by 2–14% and canny-based edge measure (Edge-F1) increases by 3–13%, compare to INR-based methods. In MIF task, our method achieves at least 2% improvement in SSIM, 6% enhancement in quality mutual information (QMI), and 6% increase in mutual information after fusion ( M I abf ) compared to existing INR-based approaches. Succinctly, the qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate the superior performance over the existing state-of-the-art methods in both tasks. The unified model eliminates the reliance on large-scale paired dataset for patient-specific image guidance.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.