Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

GAN-Assisted joint computation-communication slice orchestration for 5 G/6 G cloud-edge networks

Sep 2026 · Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications
Software-Defined Networks and 5G

Abstract

Network slicing and multi-access edge computing (MEC) require coordinated bandwidth and edge-computing allocation under bursty demand. This paper presents Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-assisted Joint Computation-Communication Slice Orchestration (GAN-JCSO), which combines conditional demand sampling with queue correction and isolation-aware placement. Under controlled heavy bursts, GAN-JCSO achieves an 11.16% request-level deadline-miss rate and 90.56% acceptance, compared with 18.96% and 83.55% for JointHeuristic. The risk-aware GAN-QCVaR-JCSO configuration draws 256 conditional samples and reserves a fixed blend of the 0.90 quantile and 0.90 conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). Quantile LSTM and Quantile Transformer controls predict the same 0.90 quantile, whereas DQN-JCSO learns a discrete reservation-envelope action. At 40% matched over-reservation over ten new paired seeds, GAN-QCVaR-JCSO records the lowest mean miss rate under rare extremes: 13.14%, compared with 14.81%, 14.04%, and 16.30% for LSTM, Transformer, and DQN, respectively. It also records the lowest mean miss rate under the burst-intensity setting of 2.6: 12.49%, compared with 13.08%, 12.96%, and 13.70%. The rare-extreme GAN–DQN contrast remains significant after Holm correction (adjusted \(p=0.031\) , raw \(p=5.61\times10^{-4}\) ), whereas DQN records lower tail latency. These results support a targeted reliability advantage for the distributional controller under matched-resource tail stress.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.