Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Node Selection in Edge Computing (Target Tracking, Fisher information)

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

This research paper examines node selection in Edge Computing and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), with a particular focus on target tracking, energy efficiency, and Fisher Information Matrix (FIM)-based decision-making. The study addresses the limitations of traditional positioning methods, where collecting sufficient measurements from anchor nodes can be difficult, costly, or impractical, particularly in indoor and complex environments. The research explores cooperative positioning, where mobile and neighboring sensor nodes share information to improve positioning accuracy. It highlights the challenge of selecting only the most useful nodes because involving unnecessary nodes can increase communication overhead, computational complexity, and energy consumption. The paper therefore reviews node selection approaches based on distance, information utility, remaining energy, and Fisher Information Matrix techniques. The paper also presents an Efficient and Adaptive Node Selection (EANS) approach for target tracking. The approach dynamically selects appropriate sensor nodes while allowing unnecessary nodes to remain in sleep mode, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining tracking performance. It combines target prediction using a particle filter with information-utility-based node selection. Overall, the research focuses on developing more efficient node-selection strategies for wireless and edge-enabled environments by balancing positioning accuracy, computational complexity, communication overhead, and energy consumption. The reported simulation findings indicate improvements in energy cost, computational complexity, and target-tracking accuracy compared with the referenced approaches.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.