Back to feed
Review Open access

Mental Health Outcomes Among University Students: Identifying Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies

Aug 2026 · Journal of Information Technology, Cybersecurity, and Artificial Intelligence · 0 citations · 5 references

Abstract

University enrollment coincides with a developmental period of heightened vulnerability to the onset of mental health difficulties, compounded by academic pressure, financial strain, social transition, and, for many students, distance from established support networks. This paper examines the prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, stress, and related outcomes among university students, and synthesizes an ecological framework spanning individual, academic, social, institutional, digital/lifestyle, and financial/environmental risk factors. Using a cross-sectional survey design modeled on validated screening instruments, we estimate symptom prevalence, identify statistically significant risk and protective factors via multivariable logistic regression, and evaluate the association between specific preventive strategies and reductions in self-reported symptom burden. Elevated stress (46.1%) and sleep disturbance (41.3%) were the most commonly reported concerns, and prior mental health diagnosis (adjusted OR = 3.12), low social support (OR = 2.48), and financial strain (OR = 2.31) emerged as the strongest independent risk factors, while regular physical activity and strong peer networks were protective. Preventive strategies — peer support programs, mindfulness-based stress reduction, adjusted academic workload policies, expanded counseling access, and physical activity programming — were each associated with meaningful reductions in elevated-symptom prevalence in program evaluation data. Stigma, lack of time, and low awareness of services were the most commonly cited barriers to help-seeking. We discuss implications for campus mental health policy, propose a multi-tiered prevention model, and outline limitations and directions for future longitudinal research. This paper synthesizes research findings for educational and policy purposes and is not a substitute for individualized clinical assessment.

Read PDF