Association of Metastatic Lymph Node Count and Primary Tumor Size with Disease-Free Survival in Stage II–III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Aug 2026· Medicina· Vol 62, pp. 1528· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Although LNR provided the best relative model fit, these within-cohort comparisons do not establish clinical superiority, and external validation is required.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The relative prognostic information provided by different nodal metrics and the independent role of primary tumor size remain unclear in gastric cancer. This study evaluated the association of metastatic lymph node count and primary tumor size with disease-free survival (DFS) in stage II–III gastric cancer (GC) treated with a surgery-first approach. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 128 patients who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2019 without neoadjuvant treatment. A multivariable Cox model with clinically prespecified covariates was fitted. Metastatic lymph node count, pathological N (pN) category, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) were each added separately to the same base clinical model and compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: During a median follow-up of 114.3 months, 86 DFS events occurred. Each additional metastatic lymph node was independently associated with a higher hazard of a DFS event (HR, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.022–1.076; p < 0.001), and this association persisted across four sensitivity analyses. Primary tumor size was not independently associated with DFS. All four nodal metrics improved model fit, with LNR yielding the lowest AIC. Conclusions: Metastatic lymph node count was independently and robustly associated with DFS, whereas primary tumor size was not. Although LNR provided the best relative model fit, these within-cohort comparisons do not establish clinical superiority, and external validation is required.
PURPOSE
The importance of preoperative lymph-node enlargement as a prognostic factor for patients with colorectal cancer remains unclear because of inconsistent staging and size criteria. We conducted this study to evaluate its clinical impact, using a standardized definition for pathological stage II colorectal cancer...
Emi Ota, M. Ozawa, Shigeru Yamagishi et al.· Surgery today (Print)· 0 citations
Tumor size has been reported as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). However, its impact in diffuse-type gastric cancer (DTGC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor size in surgically treated stage II–III GC, with comparison to intestinal-type...
K. Hayano, Yasunori Matsumoto, Y. Kurata et al.· Langenbeck's archives of sur...· 0 citations
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the preoperative CT-based Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) score for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and its prognostic significance for disease-free survival (DFS) in NAC-naive, radically resected non-metastatic gastric cancer (GC, pTNM stage I–III), and to construct...
Wang Li, Hong-Lang Li, Wen-Bin Shu et al.· Science in progress· 0 citations
Background While the therapeutic value of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains controversial, the pathological lymph node status itself may provide important prognostic information after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Among 610 consecutive patients who underwent RP between January 2000 and December 2019, wi...
Tomoyuki Shimabukuro, C. Ohmi, Koji Shiraishi· Advances in Urology· 0 citations
Background Tumour deposits (TDs) without metastatic lymph nodes are classified as N1c in the 8th edition of the AJCC staging manual. However, the prognostic value of TDs and lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the prognostic significance of TD count a...
Ming-Ming Song, Fei-Hong Wu, Yi-Xin Heng et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Background Tumor regression grade (TRG) after neoadjuvant therapy has been proposed as a prognostic marker in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, yet its independent value beyond pathological staging remains uncertain. Materials and methods This retrospective single-center study included 692 patients with local...
H. Puhr, B. Mozayani, M. Korpan et al.· ESMO gastrointestinal oncolo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.