Soft-Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix.
Jul 2026· Journal of Clinical Periodontology· 0 citations· 38 references
Medicine
TL;DR
STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling, and both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation.
Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX).
Materials And Methods
In this three-arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft-tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated-measures general linear models, accounting for within-subject variability.
Results
Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control (p < 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials.
Conclusion
STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm these findings.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759).
CTG provided the most favorable combined esthetic and radiographic outcome, and PRF improved esthetic integration but was associated with greater early marginal bone loss and should be considered an adjunct rather than a full replacement for volume-stable grafting.
A. El Hadidy, H. H. Hazzaa, A. Elgendy et al.· The Egyptian Journal of Radi...· 0 citations
Adequate peri-implant soft tissue thickness and keratinized mucosa width are crucial for implant health and aesthetics. Autogenous subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTG) are the gold-standard for augmenting thin biotypes, but they require a second surgical site. This trial evaluated whether a human fascia lata al...
A. El Hadidy, H. H. Hazzaa, A. Elgendy et al.· BMC Oral Health· 0 citations
T-PRF-treated sites showed a trend towards increased early implant stability and decreased crestal bone loss compared to control sites, however, conclusive evidence cannot be drawn about the clinical superiority of T-PRF because of the small sample size and short follow-up period.
Anuraga Tejaswi Thotimpuri, M. Pasupuleti, G. Penmetsa et al.· Journal of Advanced Periodon...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.