Cyberbullying remains a pervasive threat across social media platforms, highlighting the need for reliable detection systems and transparent decision-making processes. This work presents a comprehensive framework for cyberbullying detection that integrates two complementary eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques based on Large Language Model (LLM) explanations and a SHAP value–based interpretability. The framework leverages different models for message classification (including Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting and Multi-Layer Perceptron) to identify harmful content analyzing message-level, user-level, linguistic and stylistic features. The proposed architecture is designed to pair predictive performance with explainability, offering both natural-language justifications and feature-attribution visualizations. To assess the usability and perceived quality of the explanations, a structured evaluation has been conducted with 100 participants, including students, IT professionals, and researchers. Responses have been analyzed with respect to the Co-12 explainability properties, enabling an in-depth comparison between the two XAI approaches. Results indicate that SHAP provides more detailed content-based insights, while LLM-based explanations offer clear and user-oriented presentation. The findings demonstrate the importance of combining complementary XAI techniques to support transparency in current social networks.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15