Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Mobility-aware Lyapunov-guided deep reinforcement offloading for wearable edge computing

Sep 2026 · Scientific Reports
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Abstract

Abstract Wearable devices (WDs) are becoming an important platform for mobile intelligent services, but their limited battery capacity and computing power make continuous local inference difficult. Existing MEC offloading methods often assume fixed edge association or jointly optimize all offloading variables in a single control space, which makes it difficult to adapt to user mobility while preserving queue-aware resource control. To address the mobility-conditioned offloading problem in wearable edge computing, this paper proposes Mobility-aware Lyapunov-guided Deep Reinforcement Offloading (Mobi-LyDRO). Mobi-LyDRO uses a feasible-action-masked reinforcement-learning policy to select the discrete association between each WD and its reachable edge servers; conditioned on that association, a Lyapunov drift-plus-penalty allocator controls WD CPU frequency, offloading power and edge CPU allocation. For a stationary ergodic admissible association process that admits a queue-feasible comparator with uniformly bounded conditional second moments and service slack outside a compact backlog set, the lower Lyapunov layer retains a conditional cost-backlog tradeoff and bounded-average-queue result; this is not an unconditional guarantee for the learned association policy. Ten-seed simulations with matched mobility, fading and workload streams show that Mobi-LyDRO produces no mobility-infeasible actions, reduces handovers by 57.1% relative to Edge-only, and attains a mean ES-load Jain index of 0.962. The strong Edge-only heuristic and the infeasible-action No-mask ablation have lower modeled cost, so the measured advantage of action masking is feasibility rather than uniform cost dominance. The evaluation uses synthetic wearable-inspired arrivals with periodic and bursty variation rather than replaying measured wearable-to-edge task traces.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.