Facial Expression Recognition (FER) models frequently struggle with intrinsic emotional label ambiguities caused by overlapping facial action units, leading to high misclassification rates among confusable categories such as fear and disgust. Simultaneously, deploying advanced deep learning architectures enhanced with custom mathematical constraints onto resource-constrained embedded FPGA accelerators introduces severe operator fragmentation, where non-native operations trigger costly CPU-FPGA context switches. To address these challenges, this paper introduces YOLOv8-FLEO framework, a novel framework that integrates mutually orthogonal per-emotion subspaces to resolve feature manifold entanglement, combined with an innovative structural fold-out and post-fold fine-tuning deployment pipeline. The proposed approach eliminates DPU-hostile Gram–Schmidt operators from the network backbone, enabling seamless compilation into optimized Xilinx DPU subgraphs with zero non-native body operations. Comprehensive evaluations on the RAF-DB and FER2013 benchmarks demonstrate that YOLOv8-FLEO framework significantly elevates minority-class recall while maintaining high overall recognition accuracy (0.858 on RAF-DB). Furthermore, hardware implementation on the ZCU104 evaluation board targeting the DPUCZDX8G B4096 configuration reveals that the design operates securely on the compute-bound roofline plateau (∼266op/byte). Supported by INT8 Post-Training Quantization with negligible degradation (Δq≈0.004), the hardware accelerator achieves a sustained on-board throughput of ∼135FPS, a low latency of 7.2ms per frame, and an energy efficiency of ∼68mJ per inference, establishing a powerful paradigm for real-time, edge-optimized affective computing.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.