Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

A vanishing lemma for doubled plaquettes touching a loop edge, in Weingarten calculus for SO(m)

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical Approximation and Integration

Abstract

We record a vanishing phenomenon for exact (non-Monte-Carlo) Weingarten calculus computations on SO(m), encountered while searching for non-local closing constructions for the residual 3⁻³⁴ discrepancy in reconstructing Nissim's SO(3) deconfinement tube. Call a plaquette a 4-cycle of directed edges, and say it is doubled in a trace network if it occurs twice, identically (in either relative orientation). We prove that if a doubled plaquette has an edge e₀ of loop type (total multiplicity exactly m in the network, so its expectation is governed by the order-m moment identity of Haar(SO(m))) and at least two of its other three edges are isolated (total multiplicity exactly 2, contributed only by the two copies of the plaquette), the value of the network is identically zero, for every m≥3 and both relative orientations (Theorem 3.2). We further report, as a computationally verified but not symbolically proven proposition, that the same vanishing persists far more broadly: across 108 exact rational-arithmetic evaluations covering every way of resolving a doubled plaquette's other edges (isolated or order-4, in any mixture, with 1, 2, or 3 of the plaquette's own edges themselves of loop type), for m∈{3,5,7} and both orientations, every case vanished (Proposition 4.1). As a control, the same construction with no loop edge at all gives 1 in all 36 cases checked, confirming the vanishing is tied specifically to the loop edge, not to doubling per se. Finally we report an explicit exception: a doubled plaquette all four of whose edges are loop edges (hence sharing no edge with the rest of the network) need not vanish -- we compute its value in closed form to be 1/27 for SO(3) (confirmed by three independent implementations) and 1/1000 for SO(5) (confirmed by two).

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.