Skip to content

Quantum Computing and Cloud Technologies in Decision Support

Sep 2026 · AI and Human Expertise for Strategic Decision-Making · pp. 73-93

Abstract

This chapter surveys quantum computing and its integration with cloud infrastructures for decision support. It introduces the algorithmic core (Shor, Grover, variational circuits, and quantum linear-algebra routines), then situates current devices in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) regime – sources of noise, depth limits, gate-error rates, error-mitigation techniques, and the pathway to fault tolerance via surface codes and below-threshold operation. On the systems side, it compares deployment patterns from local simulators and on-prem accelerators to managed back-ends and examines orchestration, security, data-sovereignty, and carbon-budget considerations. Application sections treat chemistry and materials as native targets; finance, logistics, and language tasks are presented through instance-wise benchmarking against tuned classical baselines. The chapter formalizes hybrid design patterns in which quantum processors act as specialized co-processors within classical loops, with workload placement, auditability, and incident reporting aligned to current governance expectations. It then analyses quantum-cloud risks (multi-tenant side channels, energy footprint) and geopolitical dynamics (deglobalization, digital colonialism) and outlines federated and edge-to-core cloud modalities supporting Industry 5.0 aims of personalization, sustainability, and antifragility. The closing sections summarize technical obstacles (coherence, control, scalable error correction), catalogue public/educational access routes, and provide readiness checklists and architecture templates for teams preparing quantum-assisted workflows.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.