Sep 2026· Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging· 0 citations· 49 references
TL;DR
This review provides a clinician-oriented framework for understanding imaging AI by covering core model architectures, task-based applications, workflow integration, and the practical interpretation of algorithmic outputs.
Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence is now embedded in radiology workflows across detection, triage, quantification, and reporting. Yet, most clinicians deploy these tools without a working understanding of how their outputs are generated or where they reliably fail. Unlike conventional rule-based clinical workflows, modern imaging AI systems generate probabilistic outputs whose reliability depends on training data, task definition, and deployment context. Radiologists must understand what these systems actually produce, know their predictable failure points, and never allow a confidence score to replace the clinical reasoning that only a trained human can apply. This review provides a clinician-oriented framework for understanding imaging AI by covering core model architectures, task-based applications, workflow integration, and the practical interpretation of algorithmic outputs. This is important because as imaging AI scales across institutions and populations, the radiologist's capacity to interrogate, contextualize, and, where necessary, override algorithmic outputs becomes not just a clinical skill but a professional responsibility.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the most actively discussed tools in modern day radiology, promising to help interpret X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs alongside human radiologists. It has matched or exceeded human accuracy outright, particularly in a few narrow tasks. Furthermore, AI has come at a time when i...
It is argued that radiology should treat sequence as a design variable in routine clinical practice: capture what the radiologist concluded before AI exposure, then what the AI displayed and how the radiologist responded.
Joshua M. Henderson· Academic Radiology· 0 citations
IDEAL-AI organizes evidence generation across five stages and three concurrent domains: validation; governance, regulation, and ethics; and patient and system outcomes, intended to complement, not replace, established reporting guidelines, regulatory requirements, facility-level quality programs, and MLOps infrastructu...
Jasleen Saini, Sunam Jassar, Scott J. Adams et al.· Frontiers in Radiology· 0 citations
Agentic AI, including multi-agent architectures, could reshape how radiology departments operate, but the field needs prospective, multi-center trials with standardized endpoints before claiming it already has.
Wei Yi, Ya-Juan Chen, Xiao Feng et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
This review examines how AI is reshaping radiology workflow, summarises clinically relevant applications across imaging modalities, evaluates evidence regarding diagnostic performance and operational efficiency, and discusses implementation, ethics, regulation, workforce, economic, and equity-related considerations.
Neelam Rao Bharti, Deeksha Jaiswal, Nidhi Goswami et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering Indian radiology faster than the capacity of existing workflows to adapt, with increasing claims of expert-level algorithmic performance, a regulatory architecture beginning to form, and rising clinician interest. Yet translation of technically capable tools into reliab...
Suvrankar Datta, Prerna Priyadarshini, A. Rekhi· Indian Journal of Radiology...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.