Skip to content
Preprint

Dynamical spectral functions from bitstring-sampled quantum subspaces: entanglement, not one-body magic, tracks the sampling cost

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 133 references
Physics

Abstract

Sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD) and quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) are the electronic-structure methods with most hardware traction, yet their canonical target -- the ground-state energy -- is where classical methods have caught up. We move the target to dynamics and the resource question. From one bitstring-sampling primitive -- computational-basis measurements of a shallow real-time circuit, with no Hadamard or controlled unitaries -- we reconstruct, from sampled subspaces, the single-particle spectral functions $A(\omega)$ and $A(k,\omega)$ and the neutral-sector dynamical structure factors $S(q,\omega)$ and $S^{zz}(q,\omega)$, each built classically in the Lehmann representation from its own subspace. The reconstruction matches exact diagonalization on Hubbard chains and, for $A(\omega)$, across nineteen molecules (FCI-verified to $<10^{-5}$ Ha), and runs on the IBM Heron processor. Second, we ask which resource controls the cost -- the determinant support $|\mathcal{S}|$ the sampler must populate. On number-conserving states the fermionic AntiFlatness collapses to one 1-RDM invariant, $\mathcal{F}_1 = 4\,\mathrm{tr}[\gamma(1-\gamma)] = 2N_u$. An orbital-rotation (Gaussian) invariant while $|\mathcal{S}|$ is basis dependent, $\mathcal{F}_1$ is provably decoupled from the cost; the cost is instead lower-bounded and tracked by the entanglement -- the minimal bond dimension $\chi$ (Spearman $\rho = 0.90$). One-body magic is thus a faithful multireference diagnostic but an unreliable cost predictor; any genuine advantage lives in the non-Gaussianity of the higher-body cumulants. We prove moment exactness and a sampling bound polynomial in $|\mathcal{S}|$, independent of Hilbert-space dimension. Self-consistent configuration recovery improves the subspace under device noise, while a learned generative model does not beat that classical baseline.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.