Skip to content

Det‐ LIME : Detector‐Aware, Multi‐Instance Local Interpretable Model‐Agnostic Explanations for Automated Marine Mammal Detection

Sep 2026 · Marine mammal science · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Det‐LIME is proposed, a detector‐aware, multi‐instance adaptation of Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations that produced instance‐specific, box‐aligned explanations by combining per‐detection weighting, a proximity kernel that emphasizes regions near each box, and Intersection‐over‐Union‐based matching to track the same instance across perturbations.

Abstract

Despite the rapid uptake of black‐box object detectors in marine mammal research and monitoring, explainability techniques are rarely integrated into conservation workflows. Furthermore, most classification‐oriented explainability tools are ill‐suited to detection tasks involving imagery of social organisms or those with colonial life histories, as they ignore multiple detections within a scene and produce single‐instance outputs that blur evidence across individuals. These methods also generate low‐resolution, often biologically irrelevant visuals, limiting their utility for debugging, targeted data augmentation, and refined data collection. We proposed Det‐LIME, a detector‐aware, multi‐instance adaptation of Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations (LIME) that produced instance‐specific, box‐aligned explanations by combining per‐detection weighting, a proximity kernel that emphasizes regions near each box, and Intersection‐over‐Union‐based matching to track the same instance across perturbations. We evaluated Det‐LIME on aerial drone imagery for harbor seal detection, with an additional seabird case study to assess generality, and compared it with vanilla LIME, Stabilized LIME, Deterministic LIME, and gradient‐based attribution methods. Using the Attribution Ratio and Max Saliency Hit Rate metrics, we showed that Det‐LIME consistently improved multi‐instance attribution. In practice, these higher‐resolution, instance‐aware explanations provide insight into model outputs and support postprocessing, debugging, and actionable improvements in modeling and data collection or augmentation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.