The Itemlet dataset is created, which is compliant with agile-based software engineering tasks and demonstrates that the dataset complies with FAIR principles on fifteen criteria; except for one, all criteria are completely satisfied.
Abstract
The ability to benchmark new approaches and replicate already published research in empirical software engineering has suffered from limited advancement over time because there was no large-scale, multi-domain dataset containing both raw workflow data and derived features in one place. To address this, we created the Itemlet dataset, which is compliant with agile-based software engineering tasks. It is comprised of 727,282 data points from 204 projects with publicly accessible Jira issue trackers across 19 different domains. There are 108 features per sample, which consist of 60 raw structural fields retrieved from the JIRA REST API and 48 derived features. The raw structural fields and the derived features were designed to support three types of research tasks: (1) sprint planning and effort proxy analysis; (2) requirements prioritization; and (3) complexity classification. The effort-related fields are proxies reflecting how agile teams record effort; the dataset does not contain independently validated deliverable size measures (such as function points) required for formal effort estimation in the classical sense. We also demonstrated that the dataset complies with FAIR principles on fifteen criteria; except for one, all criteria are completely satisfied. The dataset can be accessed under CC-BY 4.0 license terms and has been archived at Zenodo with a DOI number:
https://zenodo.org/records/19411554
.
This work presents the first cross-task empirical evaluation of LLMs spanning five RE-related activities, as well as replication materials supporting reproducibility, and a broader understanding of the capabilities, limitations, and practical readiness of current LLMs for RE.
Jacek Dabrowski, Manjeshwar Aniruddh Mallya, Alessio Ferrari et al.· 1 citation
A lifecycle-aware framework that integrates quantitative software quality assessment with Large Language Model (LLM)-based code refinement is proposed and the potential of metric-driven LLM feedback for research software quality improvement is demonstrated while highlighting its inherently multi-objective nature.
Nafis Tanveer Islam, N. Soveizi, Yutong Li et al.· 0 citations
Agile software development continuously generates operational data through sprint execution, task completion, and effort estimation. However, the quality of these data is rarely assessed before they are used for analytics and predictive modeling, particularly in non-industrial settings. Existing data quality approaches...
M. Pérez-Cargua, Elizabeth Salazar-Jácome, Javier De la Torre-Guzmán et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations
The Feature Metric Planner is a web-based interactive tool designed to operationalize feature-level metric planning and is perceived as useful for structuring metric planning early in the development process, improving alignment between feature design and UX-related metrics, and reducing the effort required to define m...
Gessé Evangelista, Tatiana Alencar, M. Sami et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Software architecture is often only partially captured in code, while much of the design intent lives in evolving project artifacts. In agile projects, work items, user stories, and related tracking documents preserve valuable traces of that intent, but they rarely support direct architectural analysis. This work inves...
Dominik Storck, T. Eisenreich, Stefan Wagner· Proceedings of the 2nd Inter...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.