This work introduces axis-aligned feature accentuation, which converts each model’s fitted encoding axis into graded stimulus perturbations that are predicted to parametrically control neural firing within and beyond the natural-image range.
Abstract
Leading deep neural network encoding models predict visual cortical responses with nearly indistinguishable accuracy, raising the strong inference that these models have converged on the same underlying brain-aligned parameterization of natural image space. Here we demonstrate that this is not the case. We introduce axis-aligned feature accentuation, which converts each model’s fitted encoding axis into graded stimulus perturbations that are predicted to parametrically control neural firing within and beyond the natural-image range. We generated over 27,500 controller stimuli from ten leading vision models and presented them to five macaques in closed-loop experiments targeting early, mid-, and high-level visual areas. Despite matched natural image predictivity, models diverged strongly in their ability to control neural firing using accentuated stimuli, revealing that most model encoding axes failed to capture the precise tuning of their corresponding neurons. The two adversarially trained models showed a consistent advantage, though adversarial robustness was only weakly predictive of neural control across other models. Instead, control was better predicted by the spatial frequency structure of the input gradient: the distribution of pixels influencing each encoding axis. Overall, these results establish neural control via axis-aligned feature accentuation as a causal method to assess the alignment between how neurons and models parameterize the visual world.
It is found that a common result here -- that untrained or locally trained networks rival or beat backpropagation at early visual cortex -- depends strongly on the resolution at which the network is evaluated.
How neural activity across the ventral visual hierarchy supports face recognition is an open question. A long-standing debate asks whether face processing, particularly in fusiform cortex, relies on face-specific computations or representations shared with broader visual recognition. Here we combine source-resolved mag...
Hamza Abdelhedi, Shahab Bakhtiari, Karim Jerbi· bioRxiv· 0 citations
A principled zero-shot model evaluation framework in which ANN-based encoding models are frozen before being tested on not just held out images but entirely new datasets to help better understand what current models capture and what still remains to be explained.
Ruo-Lin Wang, Mayukh Deb, Alex Abate et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
It is proposed that CNN training's classification bottleneck compresses brain-relevant information at depth, unlike transformers's self-attention and non-classification objectives, which reflect signal strength and persistence rather than distinct brain regions.
S. Baghel, Kshitij Dwivedi, Dinesh Singh et al.· 0 citations
It is found that alignment with human fMRI, EEG, and macaque electrophysiology is already largely present at initialization, when networks classify at chance, and reaches a plateau within one to five epochs; thereafter it changes only modestly while classification accuracy continues to climb to 75%.
H. Scholte, Niklas Müller, Julio Smidi et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Sensory neuroscientists seek to model the neural computations that encode complex stimuli. Distinct encoding models often make similar predictions for natural stimuli such as speech, posing a challenge for model comparison. We developed a method to synthesize stimuli that decorrelate model predictions across a neural p...
David Skrill, J. Feather, Sam V. Norman-Haignere· bioRxiv· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.