Training Energy-Based Models with Non-MCMC Samplers and Efficient Temperature Estimation
Kentaro KuboHayato Goto
Sep 2026
Machine LearningQuantum ComputingData Science
Abstract
Efficient sampling from Boltzmann distributions over discrete variables is a fundamental operation in a wide range of applications. While fast non-MCMC samplers have recently emerged as promising alternatives to conventional MCMC methods, their practical use for probabilistic learning remains hindered by the difficulty of estimating the effective temperature of the generated samples. In this work, we begin by introducing Langevin simulated bifurcation (LSB), a Boltzmann sampler that enables fast and parallel sampling with accuracy comparable to sequential MCMC methods. To address the challenge of unknown effective temperature, we propose conditional expectation matching (CEM), an efficient estimation method applicable to energy-based models (EBMs) with exploitable conditional independence structures. Building on these components, we further develop a learning framework, termed sampler adaptive learning (SAL), which adaptively adjusts the model temperature to match that of the distribution induced by fast non-MCMC sampling. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LSB, CEM, and SAL on semi-restricted Boltzmann machines (SRBMs), a class of EBMs that are difficult to train using conventional approaches. LSB achieves orders-of-magnitude acceleration over Gibbs sampling while maintaining comparable or higher accuracy, and CEM enables accurate temperature estimation of the resulting distribution with negligible computational overhead. As a consequence, SAL enables efficient training of SRBMs and outperforms conventional Boltzmann machine learning methods on synthetic spin-glass datasets. In addition, the trained models achieve strong performance across multiple tasks. These results establish LSB as a fast and accurate Boltzmann sampler and provide key insights that enable practical applications of fast non-MCMC sampling methods via efficient temperature estimation with CEM.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026