AgentWeave is introduced, a deterministic pre-inference routing layer that constructs a bounded model-visible action space using eligibility, requirement, capability, and routing signals and shows lower mean local-model latency.
Abstract
Large language models increasingly operate over large collections of tools, functions, APIs, and specialized agents. As the candidate action space grows, a function-calling model must process more schemas, consume more prompt tokens, and distinguish among increasingly similar or irrelevant alternatives. We study a complementary systems strategy: reduce the candidate set before language-model inference while leaving the downstream model unchanged. We introduce AgentWeave, a deterministic pre-inference routing layer that constructs a bounded model-visible action space using eligibility, requirement, capability, and routing signals. We evaluate AgentWeave with a frozen BFCL-derived routing-pressure protocol using the public MadeAgents/Hammer2.1-1.5b model. On 48 fresh BFCL V4 multiple-function tasks, AgentWeave achieves 6/48 (12.5%) native BFCL successes, whereas all-tools, deterministic random top-8, and semantic top-8 baselines each achieve 0/48. The paired success difference is +12.5 percentage points with a 10,000-resample paired bootstrap 95% confidence interval of +4.17 to +22.92 points and exact McNemar p=0.03125. Relative to all-tools exposure, AgentWeave presents 70.18% fewer tools, uses 61.70% fewer input tokens, and exhibits 50.95% lower mean local-model latency. The result is deliberately narrow: this is a BFCL-derived routing-pressure study rather than an official full BFCL leaderboard score, and absolute task success remains low. The evidence nevertheless shows that candidate-space construction can materially affect a fixed model's function-calling behavior and motivates evaluating routing as a distinct stage before model reasoning.
The report studies singleton and multi-model routing on agentic benchmarks including DRACO and PinchBench, and argues that agentic routing is not merely cost control, but a data engine for agent-native training.
Xinchen Liu, Hang Zhou, Ying-Jie Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation· ⚡1
This work operationalizes constructive specification with constructive specification, which builds hierarchical capability representations from limited profiling over diverse benchmarks, using an optimism-guided profiler that prioritizes informative regions and prunes low-utility areas with guarantees, and enables plug...
Jian-Dong Liu, Zi-Chen Zhao, Haodong Sun et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 1 citation
This work reveals that retrieval from a structured agent repository provides a cost-efficient, accurate, and controllable alternative to dynamic agent generation, responding to the strict demands of industrial applications.
Vitalii Belov, Artyom Sosedka, Andrey Sakhovskiy et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
This work evaluates native and retrofitted looped language models on API-Bank, BFCL, and NESTful, comparing looped and non-looped models trained under matched supervised fine-tuning recipes and varying recurrent depth at inference time to suggest that looped language models are a promising architecture for agentic syst...
A. C. Popescu, Haitz Sáez de Ocáriz Borde, Pietro Liò· 2 citations
Testing three production engines showed that one achieves 22/22 syntactic TPC-H acceptance but falls short on full semantic validation, function-level pass rates of 94% on non-string categories mask dramatic per- category swings.
Unknown authors· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.