Log in
Back to #small language model
#small language model Review Open access

Augmented Reality Supported by Deep-Learning-Oriented Pedagogy for Solar System Learning: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Junior High School Students’ Creative Thinking

Bagas Brilian Ramadhan Mei Wulan S. Yamtinah Bayu Antrakusuma
Aug 2026 · Kognisi: Jurnal Ilmu Keguruan · 0 citations · 42 references

TL;DR

An augmented reality learning medium integrated with a deep-learning-oriented pedagogy for the Solar System topic supports the feasibility and educational promise of combining interactive AR visualization with cognitively engaging pedagogy.

Abstract

Creative thinking is increasingly recognized as a core learning outcome in science education, yet abstract astronomical concepts can be difficult for junior high school students to explore through conventional two-dimensional media. This study developed and preliminarily evaluated an augmented reality (AR) learning medium integrated with a deep-learning-oriented pedagogy for the Solar System topic. In this article, deep learning refers to an educational approach that emphasizes active knowledge construction, meaningful connections, reflection, and sustained cognitive engagement rather than artificial-intelligence deep learning. The study employed a Research and Development design using the ADDIE model. Two expert validators reviewed the product, and the implementation involved 32 Grade VII students selected through cluster random sampling from a population of 296 students at SMP Negeri 3 Karanganyar, Indonesia; a small-scale trial involved 10 students, and two science teachers provided practicality responses. Data were collected through observation, interviews, expert-validation questionnaires, student and teacher response questionnaires, and a 10-item pretest-posttest instrument adapted from the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking dimensions of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Expert-validation coefficients were .89 for AR media, .82 for content and language, .87 for the deep-learning lesson plan, and .80 for test content. Practicality ratings reached 83% in the small-scale trial, 88% among students in the limited-scale implementation, and 91% among teachers. A paired-samples comparison indicated a significant pre-post difference (p = .001), while the mean normalized gain was .4460, representing a moderate improvement. Fluency showed the largest gain (.4683) and elaboration the smallest (.3495). The findings support the feasibility and educational promise of combining interactive AR visualization with cognitively engaging pedagogy. Because the implementation used a one-group pretest-posttest design without a control group, the results should be interpreted as preliminary evidence rather than a causal estimate of effectiveness.

DOI Semantic Scholar
Read PDF

Similar papers

#small language model Open access Aug 2026

LifeSciBench: Evaluating Language Models on Realistic, Expert-Level Tasks in the Life Sciences

LifeSciBench is introduced, a benchmark of 750 expert-authored tasks designed to evaluate whether language models can handle realistic life science research work, with each constituent task paired with a human expert-written rubric.

Amelia Liu, Andrew Ho, Anne Marie Droste et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

TestifAI: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI, a deep learning testing framework for efficient and accurate estimation of robustness against combinations of perturbations, is proposed and partial model tomography is introduced, a novel approach to reconstructing model behaviour in a multi-perturbation space from tests that apply only a small number of perturbations.

Arooj Arif, T. Hartung, E. Botoeva et al. · 1 citation
#small language model Review Open access Sep 2026

SYNGAP1-related disorder: pathophysiology, epilepsy, cognitive and behavioral phenotypes, and precision therapeutic approaches.

A rapidly advancing precision-therapy pipeline-including antisense oligonucleotides to upregulate the intact allele, AAV-based gene replacement, CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation, epigenetic modulators, and rational pathway-targeted small molecules-offers realistic prospects for disease modification.

Debopam Samanta · 1 citation
#small language model Book Open access Aug 2026

Extracting Logical Structure in Code Documents via Semantic Segmentation and Language Models

Two language-model-based strategies are proposed for semantic code document segmentation, including a line-by-line approach that classifies each line of code separately before grouping the results into functional units, and a range-based approach that aims to directly determine groups of code lines from the input.

Abdelhalim Hafedh Dahou, A. Scherp, Sebastian Kurten et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Review Aug 2026

Large Language Models in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Triage: A Scoping Review

Large Language Models show potential in their diagnostic accuracy and consequent ability to reduce clinician burden, and may provide the greatest benefit when used to optimise referral quality at source, improving both clinician and potentially LLM triage downstream.

K. Surendran, I. Aziz, Glyndwr Jenkins · 0 citations
#small language model Review Open access Aug 2026

Quality, consistency, and clinical safety of AI-generated versus clinician-written clinical notes: a multi-country paired simulation study

Background Ambient AI documentation tools, known as scribes, are entering routine clinical practice at scale, but the evidence comparing the notes they produce against clinician-written notes is dominated by single-site, single-language studies that rely on human review to find errors, a method known to miss most documentation errors. Methods We conducted a paired simulation across five countries and languages (Cambridge/English, Barcelona/Spanish, Milan/Italian, Paris/French, Cologne/German; 385 paired consultations, 770 notes). From each actor-performed consultation, an AI scribe (Heidi) and a junior-to-middle-grade clinician independently produced a note. Notes were scored on the PDQI-9 by evaluators blinded to authorship. Documentation errors were identified by two methods of deliberately different sensitivity - clinician adjudication, and a calibrated automated reviewer externally validated against a blinded ten-clinician panel - then graded for clinical risk by a three-model panel. The co-primary outcomes were PDQI-9 total and Critical+High error burden, the latter reported under both detection arms. The analysis plan was registered before any pooling across sites. Results AI notes scored higher than clinician notes on the PDQI-9 (40.6 vs 35.6; difference +5.08, 95% CI 4.6-5.6; Cohen dz=0.55), consistently across all five sites (dz 0.41-0.75), and were less dispersed (5.7% of AI vs 27.8% of clinician notes fell below the study pre-specified low-score threshold (<32)). On the principal safety outcome - the paired probability that a note carried [≥]Critical+High error - clinician notes were affected more often under both detection arms: 61.0% versus 24.4% by the calibrated reviewer (relative risk 2.50, 95% CI 2.09-3.00) and 21.8% versus 6.2% by clinician adjudication (relative risk 3.50, 95% CI 2.32-5.27). The difference was largest for omissions. Unaided clinician review identified roughly 12% of the errors the calibrated reviewer retained, and a smaller fraction in AI notes than in clinician notes. Conclusions In this simulation, AI-generated notes scored higher on documentation quality, varied less, and carried fewer clinically significant errors than notes written on the same consultations by junior-to-middle-grade clinicians. The magnitude of the safety difference depends on the sensitivity of error detection, so we report both detection regimes and bound rather than point-estimate the absolute error rate. Extension to live practice, consultant-authored documentation, and notes as filed after clinician editing remains to be established.

H. Bergman, V. Liu, B. Austin et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts