A trial of generative AI agents as a first point of contact for mathematics support for nursing and education students at Federation University Australia found that students accessed support outside of office hours and during semester periods of highest need, indicating the potential of AI as a just-in-time learning tool.
Abstract
Maths support has long been present in Australian tertiary education, primarily as a physical space staffed by tutors and complemented by asynchronous resources and accessible via integration into course curricula. This format has proved effective in improving student retention and transition (Horrocks et al., 2026) and will only increase in salience as student cohorts diversify. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential for providing low-stakes mathematics and numeracy support that gives immediate, personalised feedback and clarification to students. A trial of generative AI (GenAI) agents as a first point of contact for mathematics support for nursing and education students at Federation University Australia found that students accessed support outside of office hours and during semester periods of highest need, indicating the potential of AI as a just-in-time learning tool. Furthermore, the qualitative data from the agent conversations showed that the agents were being utilised overwhelmingly for learning rather than cognitive offloading.
The findings indicate that students integrate AI tools primarily as complementary learning aids rather than replacements for traditional materials, and highlights the growing importance of evaluating not only usage frequency but also perceived reliability and pedagogical value.
M. Altin, Kirsten Jäger, Silke Jütte et al.· IU Discussion Papers Busines...· 0 citations
In conclusion, AI is best understood as an amplifier of pedagogy, rather than a replacement for teachers or human judgment, provided the same ethical safeguards apply.
Overall, it can be concluded that schools can realize gains if they couple AI with clear learning goals, teacher capacity-building, and robust measurement plans.
It is found that there is no significant differential effect of GenAI availability on grades overall or among previously lower-performing students, and the findings temper concerns that GenAI inflates grades and reduces students's satisfaction.
James M. Zumel Dumlao, Meng Wang, Zhong-Han Xie et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Structured human-computer interactions with higher education chatbots to explore whether these chatbots were programmed to provide financial counseling to college students found that many systems marked as AI chatbots fell short of adaptive, generative capabilities which are the essence of AI systems.
Richard Simonds, Z. Taylor, Sara Ray· Journal of Ethics and Emergi...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence is best understood as an amplifier of pedagogy, rather than a replacement for teachers or human judgment, and its benefits are conditional on AI literacy, transparent governance, and equitable access.
D. Bîrsan· Journal of Non-Formal and Di...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.