2026· IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society· Vol 7, pp. 1344-1363· 0 citations· 116 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper advocates for a forward-thinking approach that balances technical sophistication with human-centric principles, ensuring that adversarial deep learning evolves into a discipline not just of technical defense, but also of trust, transparency, and accountability.
Abstract
Adversarial deep learning has emerged as a critical area of research within computer vision, revealing both the vulnerabilities and resilience of modern neural networks. This study provides a comprehensive survey of adversarial attacks and corresponding defense mechanisms, bridging foundational concepts with recent advancements. The taxonomy of adversarial attacks is thoroughly examined, including white-box, limited-information, real-world, and modern attacks, each exploiting specific vulnerabilities in deep learning models. On the defense front, this paper explores an extensive range of strategies, from adversarial training and architectural modifications to certifiable robustness frameworks and semantic-level defenses, emphasizing their strengths and limitations. Despite significant progress, the dynamic and evolving nature of adversarial threats underscores the need for adaptive, human-centered solutions. Integrating robust defenses such as input reconstruction, ensemble-based models, and dynamic mechanisms highlights the field’s innovation, but challenges persist in achieving universal robustness and scalability. This survey emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, blending human perception, computational security, and explainable AI to design defenses that align with real-world complexities and ethical considerations. By critically analyzing current methodologies and proposing future directions, this paper contributes to advancing the security and reliability of computer vision applications. It advocates for a forward-thinking approach that balances technical sophistication with human-centric principles, ensuring that adversarial deep learning evolves into a discipline not just of technical defense, but also of trust, transparency, and accountability.
The research methodology involved a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and focusing on recent advancements in attack and defence techniques.
This survey provides a comprehensive synthesis of adversarial attacks and defense mechanisms in modern AI security, introducing a structured taxonomy categorizing attacks into evasion, poisoning, and model inversion strategies, evaluated across varying levels of attacker knowledge.
P. Mahalakshmi, D. Jayalakshmi· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
The study concluded that adversarial resilience is largely determined by the interaction between model architecture and defense strategy, highlighting the need for architecture-specific defense selection when developing secure medical image classification systems.
Y. Heryadi, I. Sonata, Bambang Krismono Triwijoyo· Matrik· 0 citations
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
The study systematically compares two distinct adversarial training strategies: ‘pre-train’, where adversarial examples are generated beforehand, and ‘in-train’, where perturbations are introduced dynamically during the training process, to understand the advantages and limitations of each approach in enhancing model r...
José María Jorquera Valero, Ibon Bengoechea Cazorla, Manuel Gil Pérez· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Among the evaluated models, CNNs exhibit the highest baseline robustness, whereas DNNs and RNNs rely more heavily on defense mechanisms to maintain performance, whereas DNNs and RNNs rely more heavily on defense mechanisms to maintain performance.
Surekha M., A. K. Sagar, Vineeta Khemchandani· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.