Skip to content

Show Me Your Prompts! How Writers Feel About Sharing Prompts in Collaborative Text Editors

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work shows that collaborative text editors should share more information among writers on when, how, and where AI is used, and suggests a strong preference for techniques that share more information about prompting activities for increased awareness.

Abstract

Generative AI writing assistants are becoming integrated into collaborative text editors; however, it is unclear how much information about a user's prompting activities should be shared with collaborators. We explore the effects of different levels of prompt information sharing within collaborative text editors: not sharing anything, sharing a placeholder to indicate AI use; sharing details about how the resulting text was generated; and sharing everything, including how the prompt was formulated, in real-time. Sixteen participants wrote persuasive essays in pairs using all four techniques. Results suggest a strong preference for techniques that share more information about prompting activities for increased awareness. Our work shows that collaborative text editors should share more information among writers on when, how, and where AI is used.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.