Code in Space: How Multimodal Human-AI Experience Can Reshape the Future of Tech Creation
Ilya ZakharovEkaterina KoshchenkoAgnia Sergeyuk
Sep 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) continue to reshape digital product development, yet the day-to-day tools for developers and designers remain bound to flat screens and 2D inputs. The intersection of AI and Extended Reality (AI-XR) introduces powerful multimodal interaction channels, such as gaze, motion, or spatial computing, that can enrich the existing Human-AI experience. A critical challenge for utilizing this multimodal opportunities lies in the understanding of how to combine these elements into a cohesive, high-level creative environment. Our study maps this territory through a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 13 AI-XR experts. Categorizing over 150 topics through thematic analysis, we outline five core dimensions of this evolving landscape: professional creation, AI as a contextual layer, new interaction paradigms, adoption frictions, and ethics and human position. Our analysis reveals that besides the critical hardware constraints, the future of AI-XR for tech creation is dependent on addressing human cognitive limits. Ultimately, succeeding in the new multimodal Human-AI experience paradigm requires moving past flat-screen metaphors to design new types of interactions that selectively manage human attention while protecting user agency.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.