Skip to content

Toward Self-Adaptive Physical AI: Can LLM Agents Manage Long-Horizon Physical Tasks?

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The results show that zero-shot LLM agents can achieve comparable management outcomes to RL agents under the same weather pattern and adapt more effectively than RL when evaluated under a shifted environment, highlighting a promising path toward self-adaptive physical AI agents.

Abstract

Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a promising path toward autonomously managing long-term physical tasks without human intervention. However, physical tasks require agents to continuously observe the environment, make consequential actions, and remain effective as the environment changes. Existing approaches either require substantial data and retraining, or primarily focus on agents operating in the virtual world. In this work, we explore the feasibility of building a self-adaptive physical AI agent that manages long-term physical tasks in a zero-shot manner and adapts to environmental changes without human intervention. We design a multi-agent framework that integrates planning, tool calling, observation, and verification, and evaluate it on agricultural tasks against reinforcement learning (RL) agents under different weather patterns. Our results show that zero-shot LLM agents can achieve comparable management outcomes to RL agents under the same weather pattern and adapt more effectively than RL when evaluated under a shifted environment, highlighting a promising path toward self-adaptive physical AI agents.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

DeliveryGym: An RL Environment for Long-Horizon Embodied Agent Planning with Adaptive Curriculum

Executable environments enable LLM agents to learn from the consequences of their actions. For embodied agents, those consequences extend beyond whether the current task succeeds: completing a delivery can consume the time, energy, or money needed for later work. Learning to plan therefore requires environments that pr...

Haoqiang Kang, Yi-Ming Zhang, Yi-Yang Guo et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When Successful Strategies Fail: Adaptation to Environmental Novelty in Terminal Agents

This work introduces AGNI, an automated pipeline that extracts trajectory-relevant assumptions, injects targeted environmental changes, and validates that the resulting novel tasks remain solvable and highlights a gap between task competence and adaptive capability and motivate environmental variation as a core dimensi...

Janvijay Singh, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Self-Evolving AI for Humanoids: Mechanisms, Safety, and Evaluation of Post-Deployment Self-Improvement

Humanoid robots are becoming an important part of embodied artificial intelligence, driven by advances in reinforcement learning for locomotion, world models for prediction, and vision-language-action models for general control. However, most of these systems remain static after deployment. A policy is trained offline...

Loc X. Nguyen, Avi Deb Raha, Huy Q. Le et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

UniIntervene++: An Adaptive Intervention Agent for Efficient Real-World Reinforcement Learning

Online reinforcement learning (RL) enables robot policies to improve through physical interaction, but the assistance they require changes as their competence evolves. Existing intervention strategies based on offline estimates or fixed decision rules can therefore become mismatched to the current policy. To address th...

Yu-Dong Lin, Hao-Yuan Deng, Zhuo-Xuan Yuan et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Find Something You Can't Do: Agentic Real-World Reinforcement Learning for Self-Improving VLA Models

FIND is introduced, an agentic real-world RL framework that closes the loop between scene understanding, weakness-aware practice, self-evaluation, and policy improvement in a persistent workspace and reframes autonomous practice as a scene-conditioned, performance-aware task-selection problem.

Yuan Fang, Ze-Chu Li, Hao-Lei Tong et al. · 2 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Agentic AI Architectures for Autonomous Decision-Making in Dynamic Environments

The increasing complexity of real-world systems has revealed the shortcomings of traditional artificial intelligence models that usually base on a set of rules or offline training. These strategies fail to work well in flexible settings where the conditions keep on changing and decisions are made on the fly. This artic...

Sanjay Tiwari, Isha Sharma, Ankita et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.