Research on Model State Machine-Based Simulation and Validation of Civil Aircraft Ground Deceleration Functional Architecture

Abstract

The implementation of the ground deceleration function in civil aircraft represents a critically complex process that deeply relies on the seamless collaboration of multiple onboard systems, including but not limited to braking, thrust reversal, spoiler, and steering systems. The operational logic governing these systems is highly intricate, characterized by tightly coupled interactions, stringent safety requirements, and a vast array of diverse physical and logical interfaces. This inherent complexity makes it exceptionally difficult to gain a thorough, system-level understanding of the implementation mechanisms and collaborative principles solely through traditional means of examining extensive, yet often fragmented, design documentation. The limitations of document-based analysis frequently lead to unforeseen integration conflicts, which are typically discovered late in the development cycle, resulting in substantial rework costs and project delays. To address this pervasive industry challenge, this paper selects the aircraft ground deceleration function as a representative case study and proposes an innovative, simulation-based validation methodology. This approach systematically utilizes model state machines to create a dynamic digital representation of the system-of-systems, enabling rigorous validation of aircraft deceleration requirements under various operational scenarios. By adopting this model-based systems engineering (MBSE) paradigm for mechanism representation, our approach effectively captures the nuanced coordination, timing dependencies, and dynamic interactions within the multi-system operational logic. It thereby facilitates the intuitive identification, analysis, and resolution of potential design flaws, including logical conflicts, deadlocks, race conditions, and uncovered or ambiguous requirements. Consequently, the method not only provides a robust framework for validating the aircraft’s function-related design requirements with greater confidence but also offers crucial, data-driven support for the iterative optimization and evolution of the overall functional architecture. The fundamental value proposition of this research lies in its transformative capability to convert implicit design knowledge and assumptions—originally scattered across voluminous documents, specifications, and expert minds—into an integrated set of executable, observable, and analyzable formal models. This digital thread enables systems engineers and designers to identify deep-seated integration and coordination issues proactively during the early conceptual and detailed design stages, rather than relying on discovery during the late, costly integration and testing phases. By shifting validation left in the development V-cycle, this approach significantly reduces the risk of major design changes and associated cost overruns later in the project lifecycle. Ultimately, it effectively enhances the overall maturity, safety, certifiability, and operational reliability of complex aircraft function development, paving the way for more efficient and predictable engineering processes.