Skip to content
Preprint

Insurance as AI Risk Infrastructure: A Generative-Agent Simulation of AI Adoption

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 43 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper introduces a socio-economic framework that complements existing technical safeguards by transferring and absorbing the residual financial consequences of AI adoption through insurance, and develops an LLM-driven agent-based social simulation (LABSS) system.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) tools has demonstrated immense potential to enhance societal well-being and operational efficiency. However, the inherent unreliability and uncertain operational consequences of modern AI systems, typified by large language models (LLMs), have created a significant barrier to enterprise adoption. Many enterprises remain hesitant to integrate these tools deeply into their workflows due to concerns about unpredictable losses and liability exposure. While existing technical safeguards primarily seek to reduce the likelihood or severity of AI-enabled workflow failures, they do not by themselves provide ex post financial protection when residual pecuniary tail losses materialize. In this paper, we introduce a socio-economic framework that complements these safeguards by transferring and absorbing the residual financial consequences of AI adoption through insurance. To evaluate this framework, we develop an LLM-driven agent-based social simulation (LABSS) system. We assess the behavioral validity of the simulation using established economic and sociological theories. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed insurance framework reduces firm-level financial exposure, thereby accelerating the aggregate adoption of AI tools and improving firm solvency and aggregate capital.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the Enterprise: A Governance Framework for Transitioning from Uncontrolled Experimentation to Secure, Accountable AI Adoption

The paper presents a ten-principle governance model, a risk-tiering structure, an agent-identity control baseline, and a four-phase implementation roadmap, concluding that prohibition-based strategies are largely ineffective and that visibility, safe enablement, and embedded controls produce more durable risk reduction...

Abhipray Mirke, Sushmita Dey Banik · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) assurance: challenges, gaps, and the path forward

This paper provides a critical review of AI assurance initiatives, examining established frameworks such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, global guidance including the OECD and G7 AI toolkits, practitioner-facing resources, and representative research-led approaches.

Anita Khadka, C. Maple · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

From Herding Machines to Autonomous Agents: A Taxonomy of AI-Driven Flash Crash Mechanisms and the Regulatory Gap

A prospective review proposes a three-category taxonomy of the mechanisms through which AI triggers catastrophic, self-reinforcing market dislocations, or “flash crashes,” and concludes with policy recommendations on model-diversity mandates, real-time AI trading surveillance, adaptive circuit-breaker design, and cross...

Kan-Ching Ng · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Financial Decision-Making: Opportunities, Risks, and Challenges

The dual nature of AI adoption in finance is examined, with AI materially improves predictive accuracy, operational efficiency, and access to financial services, with adoption accelerating sharply since the introduction of generative and agentic AI tools.

Abhishek Rajan · 0 citations
Oct 2026

The agentic frontier: A risk and resilience framework for autonomous AI reasoning

The Internet is shifting from a human-centric web towards an agentic frontier, with artificial intelligence (AI) agents increasingly integrated into daily life. The transition from instruction-based bots to goal-orientated agents is accelerating, signalling a move from automation to autonomy. According to internal Akam...

Karan Mankodi, Ryan Gao · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Governing data risks in the age of AI

This paper proposes a practical, audit-ready approach to governing data risks in the AI era, and introduces the concept of critical data elements (CDEs): data elements whose inaccuracy, unavailability, or misuse can produce material regulatory, financial, or customer-facing impact.

Xin-Fa Tu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.