Skip to content
Review Open access

Accountability and Stakeholder Trust in the Era of AI Governance: A Comparative Study of AI-Assisted and Traditional Governance Systems

Aug 2026 · Journal of Organizational and Human Resource Development Strategies · 0 citations · 23 references

TL;DR

Overall, AI-assisted governance offers substantial potential to strengthen accountability and stakeholder trust when supported by robust ethical safeguards, transparency measures, and clearly defined responsibility structures.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into organizational governance, reshaping decision-making processes, accountability mechanisms, and stakeholder relationships. This study investigates the differences between AI-assisted governance systems and traditional governance approaches regarding accountability and stakeholder trust. A narrative literature review was conducted by analyzing ten scholarly publications published between 2021 and 2026 across diverse sectors, including public administration, healthcare, finance, corporate governance, and human resource management. The review findings reveal that AI-assisted governance systems generally enhance accountability through automated auditing, explainable decision-making, predictive risk assessment, and continuous compliance monitoring. Several studies reported improvements in governance performance, ethical compliance, and risk management compared with conventional governance models. In addition, stakeholder trust tends to increase when AI systems incorporate transparency, fairness, and explainability features that allow users to understand and evaluate algorithmic decisions. Despite these advantages, important challenges remain, including unclear responsibility attribution, the lack of standardized AI governance and auditing frameworks, and potential trust erosion caused by excessive dependence on automated systems. The effectiveness of AI-assisted governance is also influenced by organizational context, leadership commitment, governance maturity, and the extent of human oversight. Overall, AI-assisted governance offers substantial potential to strengthen accountability and stakeholder trust when supported by robust ethical safeguards, transparency measures, and clearly defined responsibility structures. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussion of responsible AI governance and provide practical insights for organizations pursuing governance innovation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Responsible AI Architecture in Enterprise Modernization: Governance Frameworks, Equity Implications, and Regulatory Convergence

This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.

M. Modi · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Analysis of systems-level ethical AI compliance architecture for U.S. corporations: Integrating governance, risk management, and automated accountability

The study found that integrated ethical AI compliance architectures are critical for innovation in the responsible application of cutting-edge technologies, organizational sustainability, stakeholder trust, and long-term corporate resilience as businesses operate in an increasingly technology-driven environment.

Joy Oluchi Nwachukwu, Thaddaeuse Odhiambo, Dorcas Akorkor Apaflo et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Jul 2026

Collaborative Governance and Algorithmic Accountability: Regulating Risks and Restructuring Organizations for AI Integration

A normative analysis of thirteen recent studies on the challenges of technology implementation, ethical trust, and legal regulation suggests that the current governance dilemma stems not only from technological limitations but also from institutional neglect, which enables accountability avoidance.

Xiao-Ran Ma · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Institutional trust and public support for AI-driven governance: implications for democratic resilience

Assessing whether confidence in the US federal government’s ability to effectively regulate AI predicts citizens’ willingness to entrust AI with important decision-making responsibilities suggests that institutional trust may be an important condition for the democratic legitimacy and public acceptance of digital trans...

Akniyet Nugmanova, B. Gabdulina · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Corporate Governance and Management Control Effectiveness: A Review of Challenges and Strategic Directions

This structured literature review explores the role of corporate governance in enhancing the effectiveness of management control systems (MCS), with a particular focus on the emerging challenges and strategic directions in implementation. Drawing on peer-reviewed publications from 2020 to 2025, the study synthesizes fo...

Amalia Sholehah · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Exploring AI governance for sustainable decision-making: evidence from six case studies

Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...

Fernando Almeida · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.