Skip to content
Preprint

Real-time decoder for a MegaQuOp quantum computer using a single CPU

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · 40 references
Physics

TL;DR

An end-to-end real-time decoding stack for a universal fault-tolerant trapped-ion quantum computer architecture capable of decoding real workloads with millions of logical gates over hundreds of logical qubits is demonstrated.

Abstract

As quantum computers advance toward the regime of MegaQuOp machines executing millions of gates, a decoding system capable of real-time error correction in such a device will be crucial. Recent efforts have been focused on decoding an error-corrected memory or a small number of logical operations. Here we demonstrate an end-to-end real-time decoding stack for a universal fault-tolerant trapped-ion quantum computer architecture capable of decoding real workloads with millions of logical gates over hundreds of logical qubits. The complete pipeline, including on the fly detector error model generation, decoding of all logical qubits, logical operations, and magic-state factories, runs on a single CPU. We benchmark the decoder on practically relevant quantum applications spanning up to 408 logical qubits, and up to one million $T$ gates. Assuming a trapped-ion architecture with 1 to 5 ms cycle time, the decoding delay stretches the computation by less than $0.3\%$ at $p_{\mathrm{CNOT}}=10^{-4}$ and less than $12\%$ at $p_{\mathrm{CNOT}}=5\times 10^{-4}$ for all workloads studied. These results demonstrate real-time decoding at MegaQuOp scale on a single conventional CPU.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Experimental validation of a compact fault-tolerant architecture for trapped ions

Quantum error correction (QEC) is beginning to enable logical operations that outperform their unencoded physical counterparts, but useful fault-tolerant computation will require more than low-error quantum memory. An effective architecture must orchestrate efficient logical encoding, low-overhead logical operations, a...

Noah F. Berthusen, Ali Lavasani, Asmae Benhemou et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation

The results show that circuit-level parallelism can reduce execution cost on current quantum hardware and simulation time on GPU clusters, with the potential for greater benefits as device quality and qubit counts increase.

Avimita Chatterjee, W. M. Brown, Si-Yuan Niu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

From NISQ to Fault-Tolerance: Applications and Algorithmic Benchmarks for Spin Qubits

This work shows that the compilation method Parity Twine perfectly complements the hardware's capabilities to perform tasks such as the quantum Fourier transform or QAOA, and describes an error detection technique native to Parity Twine, which EO qubits can leverage in a unique and advantageous way to improve algorithm...

F. Lohof, Florian Ginzel, Wolfgang Lechner · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Error Correction in a Distributed Quantum Computer

The first experimental demonstration of distributed quantum error detection and correction is reported, providing an experimental foundation for quantum error correction (QEC) across modular quantum architectures.

E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, T. Araki et al. · 2 citations
Review Sep 2026

Quantum Compiler Design for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing

This survey presents a full-stack view of compiler design for QEC-protected quantum computation, and identifies open challenges in cross-layer optimization, qLDPC compilation, compiler-decoder co-design, runtime adaptivity, and the development of integrated and benchmarkable FTQC compilation stacks.

Cheng-Hong Zhu, Jia-Han Chen, Ke-Ming He et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Quantum Circuit Pruning: From NISQ Architectures to Fault-Tolerant Operations

Routing-aware pruning is established as a practical and unified compilation strategy across the quantum computing stack and a feasibility analysis on FT hardware indicates that pruning is expected to remain relevant across a range of code distances and physical error rates.

Pau Escofet, C. G. Almudéver, S. Abadal et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.