This survey reviews agentic quantitative trading across five stages: factor mining, signal discovery, portfolio construction, order execution, and risk management, and finds that current systems remain concentrated on signal discovery, while complete integration with portfolio construction, execution, and risk control is still uncommon.
Abstract
Quantitative trading is moving from isolated predictive models toward agentic workflows that combine reasoning, tool use, memory, and feedback. This survey reviews agentic quantitative trading across five stages: factor mining, signal discovery, portfolio construction, order execution, and risk management. We further examine agentic quant trading systems through architecture, coordination, and adaptation, while comparing benchmarks across strategy construction, offline trading, live market evaluation, and reliability assessment. Our review finds that current systems remain concentrated on signal discovery, while complete integration with portfolio construction, execution, and risk control is still uncommon. Multi-agent systems also rely heavily on aggregation despite increasingly diverse workflow structures. Benchmark evidence further shows that strong model or forecasting capability does not reliably translate into trading performance under live market conditions and reliability controls. We conclude with future directions for more complete trading workflows, stronger coordination, and evaluation matched to the capability being assessed.
Large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise in financial decision-making, yet existing evaluations focus on equity trading and primarily assess directional prediction, overlooking the structural complexity of derivative markets. Option trading introduces fundamentally different challen...
Hao-Chen Luo, Yi-Fan Li, Binh Minh An et al.· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a significant force in the field of quantitative trading because it extends traditional rule-based systems to areas such as adaptive prediction, dynamic configuration and automated execution. At the same time, the widespread adoption of machine learning, reinforcement learning, a...
Zi-Chong Long· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
Experiments show that EvolveTrade often improves Sharpe Ratio and Cumulative Return over fixed-policy LLM baselines, achieving the improved SR and CR in most evaluated settings, and suggest that adapting the reusable procedure governing tool use is a key direction for building more robust LLM trading agents.
Sehee Kim, Yumin Choi, Minki Kang et al.· 1 citation
DSA is presented, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents that establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.
EnterpriseBench is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates LLM agents across this spectrum, from static question answering to dynamic decision-making, and shows that it provides a practical benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic enterprise strategic reasoning and decision-making.
Min Yang, Yi-Chen Pan, Jing-Hua Piao et al.· 1 citation
This article compares US, Canadian, and EU regulatory approaches and shows how divergence creates compliance, competitive, and cross-border risks, and proposes four controls: autonomy-proportional governance, security by design, agent stress testing, and fiduciary controls.
Vincent Grégoire· Journal of Portfolio Managem...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.