Architecting Safety-Critical Systems for AI-Enabled Software-Defined Vehicles: A Compute, Timing, and Isolation Framework with a Brake System Case Study
Sep 2026· SAE technical paper series· 0 citations· 10 references
TL;DR
A safety-oriented architectural framework that constrains how AI-enabled functions may be integrated into fail-operational by-wire systems and clarifies trade-offs among safety isolation, latency, and AI performance while preserving braking safety guarantees under continuous software evolution is proposed.
Abstract
Software-defined vehicle (SDV) platforms are reshaping safety-critical system design by consolidating braking and other motion-control functions on centralized heterogeneous edge compute that also executes physical-AI workloads. This consolidation breaks traditional assumptions of fixed ECUs and simple timing envelopes, complicating assurance of determinism, isolation, and fail-operational behaviour for ASIL-D brake functions. Building on a decentralized brake-by- wire (BbW) architecture with dual controllers, redundant low-voltage power grids, and smart electromechanical brake corner actuators, this paper proposes a systems-level framework for architecting safety-critical functions in AI-enabled SDVs along three dimensions: compute, timing, and isolation. The framework classifies conventional and AI-based functions and maps them to heterogeneous compute classes; defines architectural patterns that combine safety islands, power-domain redundancy, and hardware partitioning to support freedom from interference; and formalizes timing domains and contracts that bound latency, jitter, and failover dynamics across sensors, centralized controllers, and decentralized actuators. The contribution is not a new AI algorithm, but a safety-oriented architectural framework that constrains how AI-enabled functions may be integrated into fail-operational by-wire systems. A BbW case study with edge-resident AI observers and anomaly detectors shows how the framework complements System Analysis Tool (SAT)– based failure modelling and clarifies trade-offs among safety isolation, latency, and AI performance while preserving braking safety guarantees under continuous software evolution.
FAA+RTS is a novel solution as it integrates previously-isolated methods for dealing with multiple constraints into a single framework, presenting a single overview of all possible trade-offs to the application designer, resulting in a robust and reliable system.
L. Miedema, D. Sapra, P. Novobilsky et al.· 0 citations
Discussions of the software-defined vehicle (SDV) paradigm have developed almost entirely around automotive assumptions, where middleware fragmentation and connectivity availability get treated as the primary obstacles to adoption. For off-highway equipment construction, mining, and agricultural machinery, a different...
Shyam Laheri Chunduri· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The results prove the platform provides a highly flexible, extensible, and economically accessible open-source alternative to proprietary motorsport instrumentation.
G. Kourtis, Paris Kitsos· Electronics· 0 citations
The time-triggered paradigm has proven highly suitable for closed safety-critical distributed real-time systems with predetermined configurations and stringent timeliness and dependability requirements. The Time-Triggered Architecture (TTA) embodies this paradigm by combining a globally synchronized time base, offline-...
Mohammad Ibrahim Alkoudsi, Marcus Völp, Gerhard Fohler· IEEE Access· 0 citations
A four-layer framework that supports traceable, bidirectional interaction between a system’s architecture and its physical implementation and contributes to MBSE-driven digital twin research by providing a structured process for integrating architecture, translation, execution, monitoring, and synchronization in a trac...
M. Islam, Aditya Akundi, Sergio A. Luna Fong· Systems· 0 citations
Modern intelligent cockpits consolidate In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI), navigation, and control-related services on shared heterogeneous hardware. This consolidation creates a resource-management problem because cockpit workloads have different controllability, safety, and performance requirements. Existing open-source...
Yi-Cheng Gu, Bing Deng, Yun Wang et al.· ACM Transactions on Architec...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.