Skip to content

ExplorIt: Simulation-based Fuzzing for Autonomous Driving Systems via Multi-Agent Interaction Modeling

Jul 2026 · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · 0 citations · 56 references

TL;DR

ExplorIt, a simulation-based ADS fuzzer enhanced with systematic formalization of interaction behaviors, formalizes the runtime EGO-to-NPC interactions through drivable area estimation and can then deterministically mutate scenarios to curate more critical interactions by making EGO and NPC head for shared drivable areas.

Abstract

Fuzzing-based simulation testing has become a fundamental technique for assessing the safety of autonomous driving systems (ADS). It operates by iteratively mutating simulation scenario configurations, scheduling scenario execution, and monitoring ADS-involved accidents. However, existing ADS fuzzers commonly rely on simplistic criticality metrics (e.g., inter-vehicle distance) for prioritizing critical scenarios during fuzzing, and lack deterministic guidance about how these heuristic-based critical scenarios should be further mutated to finally induce ADS-responsible accidents. Therefore, these existing fuzzers would inevitably miss truly critical driving scenarios or report various non-ADS-responsible accidents. To address these limitations, our key insight hints that EGO-to-NPC interactions (i.e., those recorded during the execution of a given scenario) offer comprehensive spatial-temporal information for reliable selection of critical scenarios and deterministic scenario mutation. Following this insight, we propose ExplorIt, a simulation-based ADS fuzzer enhanced with systematic formalization of interaction behaviors. Specifically, ExplorIt formalizes the runtime EGO-to-NPC interactions through drivable area estimation. That is, vehicles that share overlapped driving areas are considered to have interactive relationships. Under this modeling, ExplorIt can then deterministically mutate scenarios to curate more critical interactions by making EGO and NPC head for shared drivable areas. Extensive experiments on Apollo 8.0 demonstrate ExplorIt’s effectiveness, revealing 6.7 times more unique ADS-responsible accidents than baseline tools (i.e., DriveFuzz, SAMOTA, and AutoFuzz). Moreover, 83.2% of the reported accidents are ADS-responsible, compared to just 16.8% with baseline tools.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

MG-Fuzz: Model-Guided Fuzzing for Unsafe Scenario Discovery in Autonomous Driving Systems

As autonomous driving systems (ADS) are increasingly deployed in real-world environments, discovering diverse unsafe driving scenarios remains a fundamental yet difficult problem. Existing scenario generation and testing approaches often rely on black-box exploration or externally-observed heuristic feedback, which str...

Yulong Lyu, Rui-Qi Hong, Jia-Wan Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Constraint- and Risk-Driven Search for Safety-Critical Scenarios in Autonomous Driving Simulation

Efficient discovery of safety-critical scenarios is a central problem in autonomous-driving simulation because safety-critical events are rare and the scenario parameter space is often high-dimensional. Direct random sampling can spend most of the simulation budget on samples that are weakly relevant, physically unreac...

Deng Pan, Bin Lu, Xiaoji Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Autonomous vehicle safety testing acceleration: A new diffusion-reachability framework for high-risk powered two-wheeler interactions.

Safe operation of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in complex traffic scenarios remains a challenge, particularly in interactions with Powered Two-Wheelers (PTWs), whose riders represent a common and vulnerable group of road users. This study proposes DRIVE (Diffusion-Reachability-based Interaction and Validation for Efficien...

Hei-Lai Huang, Zimo Yang, Jiang Bian et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Fixed-Point Guided ADS Scenario Generation via Multi-modal LLM Reasoning and Software Testing

Robust scenario generation is essential for systematically testing Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) under rare and safety-critical conditions. However, search-based approaches often lack semantic guidance, whereas specification-based approaches rely heavily on manually constructed rules. Existing LLM-assisted techniqu...

Xu-Dong Zhang, Shi-Hao Zhu, Yan Cai · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Are We Stuck? Modeling and Detecting Deadlocks in Multi-autonomous Vehicle Systems

Autonomous driving system (ADS) testing is essential to ensure the safety and reliability of autonomous vehicles (AVs) prior to deployment. As ADSs are increasingly deployed in multi-AV traffic environments, it becomes crucial to assess their cooperative performance, particularly with respect to deadlock, a fundamental...

Ming-Fei Cheng, Xiao-Fei Xie, Li-Li Quan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.