A unified conditional-flow framework that casts generation, semantic editing, and intra-structural retargeting as condition-modulated transport within one text- and skeleton-conditioned rectified-flow model, replacing separate pipelines with a single conditional motion transport model while keeping the same-topology retargeting scope explicit.
Abstract
Text-driven motion editing and intra-structural retargeting, where skeletons share topology but may differ in bone lengths and rest pose, are traditionally handled by fragmented pipelines with incompatible inputs and representations: editing relies on specialized generative steering, while retargeting is deferred to geometric post-processing. We present a unified conditional-flow framework that casts generation, semantic editing, and intra-structural retargeting as condition-modulated transport within one text- and skeleton-conditioned rectified-flow model. Under this formulation, editing changes the semantic condition while preserving skeletal structure, whereas retargeting changes the skeletal condition while preserving motion semantics. This makes FlowEdit-style transport a unified inference rule for motion manipulation rather than a task-specific editor. To instantiate this for articulated 3D motion, we develop a text- and skeleton-conditioned rectified-flow transformer. The model uses per-joint tokenization and explicit joint self-attention to capture spatial kinematic dependencies. We further inject text conditions at both joint and frame levels, while residual multi-condition classifier-free guidance balances text adherence and skeletal conformity. Experiments on SnapMoGen and a multi-character Mixamo subset show that one trained model supports text-to-motion generation, zero-shot editing, and zero-shot intra-structural retargeting without task-specific fine-tuning. This unified framework replaces separate pipelines with a single conditional motion transport model while keeping the same-topology retargeting scope explicit.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.