Sep 2026· Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing· 0 citations· 4 references
TL;DR
CARE-MoE is proposed, an efficient MoE LLM inference framework comprising two core components that balances expert placement by jointly modeling co-activation correlation and hot–cold drift, preventing overload from correlated experts and enabling low-cost adaptive rebalancing.
Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a mainstream architecture for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to its sparse activation mechanism. While distributed inference is promising for deploying LLMs on resource-constrained edge devices, it still faces two critical challenges for MoEs. First, the gating network’s strong bias toward a small subset of hot experts causes severe cross-device load imbalance. Cloud-side methods, such as expert replication, incur prohibitive memory overhead, and global load balancing introduces excessive communication latency in edge networks. Existing edge methods overlook expert co-activation correlations and cannot adapt to hot-cold expert drift induced by shifting user interactions. Second, the All-to-All communication overhead of expert parallelism can dominate the inference latency under bandwidth-constrained edge environments. Existing token dropping or fusion strategies reduce communication at the cost of distorted token feature propagation and degraded long-context accuracy. To address these challenges, we propose CARE-MoE, an efficient MoE LLM inference framework comprising two core components. The Correlation-Aware Expert Placer (CAEP) balances expert placement by jointly modeling co-activation correlation and hot–cold drift, preventing overload from correlated experts and enabling low-cost adaptive rebalancing. The Communication-Aware Expert Router (CAER) exploits semantic equivalence in MoEs to redirect token-expert assignments toward low-latency devices, thereby achieving significant communication reduction with negligible accuracy loss. Experiments across diverse edge environments and MoE models demonstrate that CARE-MoE achieves a 2.1 × to 5.2 × speedup over state-of-the-art baselines.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.