General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) is the cornerstone of high-performance computing and deep learning. Its efficiency significantly influences the performance of applications ranging from large language models to scientific simulations. Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) significantly boost matrix operations throughput, yet existing implementations underutilize its potential. The core bottleneck is that AMX’s unique microarchitectural constraints break the classic Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (AVX-512) GEMM paradigm, causing critical data reuse loss across the memory hierarchy: inefficient vector register reuse during mandatory layout transformation, poorly reconciled trade-off between Tile register reuse for partial sums and L1 cache locality, and severe buffer reuse degradation due to fine-grained update strategies. To address these challenges, we propose TileGEMM, a high-performance GEMM implementation on AMX that systematically enhances data reuse across the memory hierarchy. First, a dual Tile register layout transformation strategy eliminates redundant memory accesses, maximizing vector register reuse. Second, a multi-level cache- and Tile register-aware tiling strategy adopts a K-dimension-centric model under strict L1 capacity constraints, improving Tile register reuse for intermediate partial sums while preserving L1 cache locality. Third, a coarse-grained buffer update strategy with loop reordering extends transformed data residency, boosting buffer reuse and reducing transformation overhead. Extensive experiments in various matrix configurations show that TileGEMM achieves average speedups of 3.27 × and 1.27 × over AMX-based implementations LIBXSMM and OneDNN, and 10.30 × and 7.96 × over AVX-512-based implementations TVM and MKL, respectively.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.