Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

A spatial dataset for identifying disadvantaged communities facing cumulative climate and economic burdens in the United States

Sep 2026 · Environmental Research Climate
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities

Abstract

Abstract The Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) was developed by the U.S. federal government in 2021 to identify and support marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by climate change. This tool identifies disadvantaged communities based on the presence of low-income residents and one of eight climate, environmental, or health-related burden categories. Communities that meet these criteria were eligible for funding from the White House Justice40 initiative, which sought to direct 40% of overall benefits from investments in climate, clean energy, and sustainable housing into these communities, designated as Justice40 communities. While CEJST includes a wide range of indicators to evaluate burden categories and designate census tracts as Justice40 communities, it does not include any measure of overall community risk or harm resulting from multiple and overlapping burdens. We sought to address this limitation and extend the binary CEJST framework by creating an open geospatial dataset and web-based tool that includes new variables to quantify the cumulative impacts of CEJST burden categories and indicators that comprise these categories. For each census tract in the U.S., we computed new cumulative burden scores representing the total number of burden categories and indicator thresholds exceeded according to the CEJST guidelines, as well as spatial cluster classifications (hot spot, non-significant, or cold spot) based on both the number of burden categories and indicator thresholds exceeded. By analyzing and incorporating cumulative burdens using cutting-edge geospatial techniques, this extended CEJST dataset and tool will promote more meaningful and equitable investment to support overburdened disadvantaged communities facing the greatest risk from climate change.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.