Abstract The Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) was developed by the U.S. federal government in 2021 to identify and support marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by climate change. This tool identifies disadvantaged communities based on the presence of low-income residents and one of eight climate, environmental, or health-related burden categories. Communities that meet these criteria were eligible for funding from the White House Justice40 initiative, which sought to direct 40% of overall benefits from investments in climate, clean energy, and sustainable housing into these communities, designated as Justice40 communities. While CEJST includes a wide range of indicators to evaluate burden categories and designate census tracts as Justice40 communities, it does not include any measure of overall community risk or harm resulting from multiple and overlapping burdens. We sought to address this limitation and extend the binary CEJST framework by creating an open geospatial dataset and web-based tool that includes new variables to quantify the cumulative impacts of CEJST burden categories and indicators that comprise these categories. For each census tract in the U.S., we computed new cumulative burden scores representing the total number of burden categories and indicator thresholds exceeded according to the CEJST guidelines, as well as spatial cluster classifications (hot spot, non-significant, or cold spot) based on both the number of burden categories and indicator thresholds exceeded. By analyzing and incorporating cumulative burdens using cutting-edge geospatial techniques, this extended CEJST dataset and tool will promote more meaningful and equitable investment to support overburdened disadvantaged communities facing the greatest risk from climate change.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.