This review examines molecular determinants of RS tolerance, focusing on human T-cell leukemia virus type 1-mediated adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) as a model of virus-mediated rewiring of DNA damage responses.
Abstract
Replication stress (RS) represents a major vulnerability of cancer cells treated with nucleoside analogs and related antimetabolites; however, tumors frequently acquire tolerance mechanisms that permit survival despite persistent DNA lesions. This review examines molecular determinants of RS tolerance, focusing on human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-mediated adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) as a model of virus-mediated rewiring of DNA damage responses. Chain-terminating nucleoside analogs generate aberrant replication intermediates, including blocked 3’ DNA termini, mis-incorporated bases, and stalled replication forks. In ATL, viral oncoproteins suppress key components of replication stress response pathways, notably tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) and mismatch repair (MMR), thereby creating exploitable repair deficiencies. Consistent with this vulnerability, ATL cells exhibit marked sensitivity to replication stress–inducing agents such as irinotecan (CPT-11) and the chain-terminating nucleoside analog abacavir. Recent CRISPR-based functional genomics studies further identify Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) as an independent and dominant regulator of RS sensitivity. SLFN11 determines the fate of stressed replication forks independently of lesion processing, acting as an execution factor that converts otherwise tolerable RS into irreversible replication arrest. We conclude by discussing therapeutic strategies that exploit RS tolerance defects in ATL, including biomarker-guided nucleoside analog therapy, and rational combination approaches targeting compensatory RS pathways.
Genomic instability and immune escape are linked features of hematologic malignancies, but the mechanisms that allow malignant cells to tolerate persistent nuclear and genotoxic stress while avoiding damaging DNA-sensing responses remain incompletely defined. Barrier-to-autointegration factor 1 (BANF1) is a small DNA-b...
Xia Jiang, Yi-Han Zhang, Dong Chen et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
This review summarizes the major DDR pathways, their roles in tumor evolution and immune remodeling, and the rationale and limitations of combining DDR-targeted therapies with immunotherapy and discusses biomarker refinement, resistance mechanisms, and future strategies for translating genomic stress into durable antit...
The DNA damage response (DDR) network maintains genomic integrity, functions as a signaling hub that viruses exploit to drive pathogenesis, and constitutes a central interface between viral infection and host cell fate. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms by which viruses subvert host DDR pathways, with an e...
A modular biomarker framework integrating genomic, functional, immune‐context, spatial and dynamic readouts to guide patient selection, treatment adaptation, and precision therapeutic decision‐making is proposed.
Yi-Huan Qiao, B. Kang, Jian Zhang et al.· MedComm· 0 citations