Online research platforms underpin much of what science claims about people, on the assumption that a human produced each response. Generative AI threatens that assumption by letting participants delegate responses to a chatbot, yet how often they do so remains unclear because prior estimates rely on self-report or aut...
Neil K. R. Sehgal, Manuel Tonneau, Dunigan Folk et al.· 0 citations
While generative AI models can produce visually faithful artwork, they often fall short in conveying emotional authenticity--a key driver of human expression. In visual storytelling, particularly comic storyboarding, this gap becomes pronounced: effective storyboards require both technical knowledge (e.g., anatomical a...
Jocelyn Shen, Isabella Pu, Alessandro Brise\~no et al.· 0 citations
People communicate how things should move by combining words with demonstrations: "open it like this." We present an interaction technique that brings this expressive resource to conversational 3D authoring. Building on "Put-That-There," our system combines speech, pointing, and spatiotemporal demonstrations to specify...
Hamza El Alaoui, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jun Rekimoto· 0 citations
The rapid deployment of AI systems has created socio-technical, psychological, and operational harms that can elude ex-ante threat modelling and ex-post incident tracking. We introduce an LLM-assisted thematic analysis pipeline to dynamically detect, categorise, and track emerging AI harms from large-scale social media...
Jacqueline Rowe, Animesh Srivastava, Sai Teja Peddinti et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Recent research has revealed that accessibility in virtual collaboration is not only a technical problem but also depends on allyship: the informal, interpersonal practices through which people support others' accessibility needs. Yet little research has examined how artificial intelligence (AI) might support allyship...
Crescentia Jung, Ricardo E. Gonzalez Penuela, Prashita Biswas et al.· 0 citations
As AI enters reflection and emotional support, understanding how it can participate in personal meaning-making while preserving users' authority over interpretation is increasingly important. We present ClayFlect, a novel MLLM-powered system integrating tactile clay-making with conversational and visual generative AI,...
Kellie Yu Hui Sim, Quoc-Nam Nguyen, Shuenn Yuen Han et al.· 0 citations
Despite the ubiquity of sensors in wearable and mobile devices and the abundance of human movement data they generate, translating unlabeled recordings into foundational motion models remains an open challenge. Self-supervised learning (SSL) has alleviated the need for costly annotations, yet existing approaches leave...
Marius Bock, Yuwei Zhang, Juergen Gall et al.· 0 citations
We present REFIT, an input calibration for frozen activity-recognition models whose inertial sensors are worn differently at deployment than in training. When users move a watch to the other wrist or put a strap sensor back on turned, the model sees the same motion on changed axes. REFIT undoes such shifts without labe...
Do large language models' (LLMs') answers to self-report questionnaires predict how they behave? Prior work finds they do not, but it uses human personality inventories, so the gap could reflect borrowed human constructs rather than LLM self-report itself. We test this with a self-report instrument built from LLM-speci...
Partial driving automation creates a tension: drivers remain legally responsible while being less active in control. Meaningful human control (MHC), a normative framework that can potentially address this tension, proposes that automated systems are designed to track relevant human reasons and that humans should at all...
Ashwin George, Lucas Elbert Suryana, Lorenzo Flipse et al.· 0 citations
What-if analysis (WIA) lets users explore hypothetical scenarios by adjusting parameters, applying constraints, and scoping data through interactive interfaces. Current tools fall short: spreadsheet and BI tools require laborious setup, while LLM-generated interfaces frequently misinterpret analytical intent. It remain...
Sneha Gathani, Sirui Zeng, Diya Patel et al.· 0 citations
AI learning tools are rapidly entering classrooms, but evidence about whether they help students learn is mixed and rests mostly on test scores. Comparatively less research addresses whether the use of AI changes students' live learning behaviors in class. Here, we report the results of a preregistered field experiment...
Dan J. Wang, Neelam Modi Jain, Vanessa Burbano et al.· 0 citations
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.
Computer scientist, entrepreneur, and philanthropist will collaborate with the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing to advance AI and scientific discovery.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
