Skip to content

Author

Ziad Hunaiti

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Sep 2026

Deep Learning Methods for Breast Cancer Detection, Classification, and Segmentation Using MRI Scans: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, underscoring the importance of early and accurate diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a highly sensitive imaging modality for detecting breast malignancies, particularly in patients with dense breast tissue or those at high risk, where conventional imaging techniques may have limited sensitivity. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have demonstrated considerable potential for improving the automated analysis of breast MRI, including tumour classification, prediction, and segmentation. This systematic review synthesises peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025 that exclusively applied DL techniques to breast MRI for cancer classification, prediction, or segmentation. The included studies were critically evaluated with respect to model architectures, dataset characteristics, image preprocessing methods, validation strategies, and reported performance metrics. The reviewed literature demonstrates that DL models consistently achieve high diagnostic performance and have the potential to enhance radiological workflows by supporting automated lesion detection and clinical decision-making. However, several challenges continue to limit their translation into routine clinical practice, including limited access to large, diverse, and well-annotated datasets, inadequate external validation, variability in MRI acquisition protocols, and concerns regarding model interpretability and generalisability. Future research should prioritise the development of robust, explainable, and clinically validated DL models trained on multicentre datasets using standardised evaluation frameworks. Addressing these challenges will be essential to improve the reliability, reproducibility, and clinical applicability of AI-assisted breast cancer diagnosis using MRI.

Qais Al-Azzam, W. Balachandran, Ziad Hunaiti · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Coronary Artery Disease Prediction Using ECG and CCTA: A Systematic Review

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, highlighting the need for more reliable and efficient diagnostic tools beyond conventional methods. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has shown strong potential for detecting obstructive CAD by learning complex patterns from electrocardiogram (ECG) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data. This rapid systematic review assesses and compares the diagnostic performance and methodological quality of AI models built for CAD prediction using ECG and CCTA data. A systematic search following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted for primary studies published between 2021 and 2025. Eleven studies were included, six using ECG data and five using CCTA data. Methodological quality was evaluated using the PROBAST+AI tool. ECG-based models achieved AUCs of 0.72–0.961 and CCTA-based models showed slightly stronger top-end performance, with AUCs of 0.77–0.97. External validation was uncommon in both groups, applied in only 40% of CCTA studies and 33% of ECG studies, so neither modality demonstrated clearly greater validation maturity. Despite these strong results, PROBAST+AI assessment revealed a high risk of bias in 90.9% of the included studies, largely due to weaknesses in the analysis domain, including poor handling of missing data and the absence of model calibration reporting. AI models show strong diagnostic accuracy for CAD across both modalities, although external validation was limited and applied in a minority of studies. However, the widespread methodological bias means these tools should currently support clinical decision-making rather than replace standard diagnostic methods. Future studies should focus on prospective multicentre validation and the use of multimodal data.

Ahmad Ibrahim Alshdaifat, W. Balachandran, Ziad Hunaiti · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.