Differentially private (DP) fine-tuning methods treat sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models as a single dense block, ignoring that shared layers see all data while experts only see routed records. We identify and formally characterize three resulting failure modes: global clipping suppresses expert gradients, batch-level normalization dilutes sparse expert updates, and fixed privacy noise degrades signal-to-noise ratio on low-load experts. We introduce RAPTOR - a Role-Aware Private Training framework, which alternates shared and expert optimization and targets each failure directly, using expert-specific clipping and noise together with a public expected-owner denominator and a count-independent update schedule that avoids conditioning on private, realized expert counts. We prove the resulting mechanism satisfies $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-DP: because each record is assigned to exactly one owner expert, per-expert mechanisms within a layer compose in parallel, so updating all $E$ experts costs no more, in privacy terms, than updating one, with shared and expert streams composing sequentially across training. We further derive a bias-variance decomposition of the public-denominator estimator showing its bias grows predictably with routing imbalance, yielding a privacy-free rule for selecting which layer to protect from routing entropy measured on a small public corpus. Experiments on Switch Transformer and OLMoE fine-tuning across GLUE tasks, and on DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny, show consistent gains over standard DP baselines across several privacy levels ($\varepsilon$), with the largest margins typically at the tightest budgets. Code and models are publicly available: https://github.com/leduckhai/RAPTOR
Duc Dm, Khai Le-Duc, D. Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
Cue-induced bias is best understood not as a single flaw in LLMs but as a family of causally effective linear directions that are largely shaped by alignment tuning.
Prakhar Gupta, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Florent Draye et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Concept-Targeted Attribution (CTA) provides a framework for moving from behavioral probe accuracy to mechanistic explanations of probe performance, enabling more detailed audits of internal concept representations, including safety-critical ones.
V. Palit, Florent Draye, Terry Jingchen Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.