We have 3 of 24 papers
We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
This work organizes 19 public benchmarks into four systemic-risk categories defined by the EU GPAI Code of Practice---CBRN, cyber offense, harmful manipulation, and loss of control---and evaluates models using harm-preserving perturbations and simulated deployment contexts.
This work proves that the answer is negative: drawing from incomplete contract theory, it is formally shown that when contracts cannot distinguish all relevant future contingencies, there is a strictly positive welfare loss that no realistic mechanism can eliminate.
Evaluating three frontier models across six games in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups over 10 rounds, it is found that different models interpret announcements incompatibly, some as binding commitments and others as cheap talk, producing payoff gaps that emerge in Round~0 and persist across all 10 rounds.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
