Author

Zhen Zhang

1 paper indexed here

Fetches their full publication history.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Jul 2026

Large Language Models for Task Planning in Embodied AI: A Survey

Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as promising components for task planning in embodied artificial intelligence (AI), where agents must decompose high-level natural language instructions into executable action sequences under dynamic environments and physical constraints. Unlike purely text-based planning, embodied task planning requires grounding in object affordances, partial observability, and the gap between symbolic reasoning and low-level control execution. Classical planning methods, such as STRIPS, PDDL, and HTN, provide formal and interpretable frameworks, yet they struggle with unstructured real-world settings and open-ended instructions. This paper surveys LLM-based approaches to embodied task planning. We present a structured taxonomy that organizes existing work into three complementary paradigms: (1) hierarchical planning, where LLMs serve as high-level planners that decompose goals into subgoals; (2) closed-loop planning, where execution feedback and environmental state monitoring support replanning; and (3) end-to-end embodied planning frameworks, where multimodal LLMs and vision-language-action models integrate perception, language understanding, and action prediction within learned policies. vcThese categories are not strictly mutually exclusive, but rather represent dominant architectural tendencies in current LLM-based embodied task planning research.. We compare these paradigms along dimension of accuracy, robustness, scalability, efficiency, and sim-to-real transfer. The comparison suggests that while LLMs are effective for commonsense-driven task decomposition and feedback-based replanning, they remain limited in physical reasoning, real-time efficiency, and reliable low-level execution. Open challenges are further discussed, including granularity mismatch, physical commonsense deficits, safe replanning, and benchmark standardization, and outline future directions toward more reliable and physically grounded embodied planning.

Zhen Zhang · 0 citations