Driving in the real world is open-world: a car may encounter a fallen mattress, a deer, or other objects outside its training data. Naming them is not enough. The system must know how to treat each region: can it drive over it, and how severe would a collision be? We therefore shift scene perception from category labels to dense action-relevant attributes, where each pixel is labeled by how it should affect motion rather than by object name. We instantiate this general formulation with two ordered attributes: 7-rank drivability and 5-rank vulnerability. We read Qwen3.5 image-token hidden states directly as a spatial semantic representation. A lightweight boundary-aware decoder then turns this coarse token grid into sharp full-resolution attribute maps. The whole process requires neither autoregressive text generation nor an external mask model such as SAM. We train on dense attribute labels built in CARLA and test transfer to real scenes and to novel obstacles never seen in training. We compare with vision-only segmenters trained on the same attributes and prompted VLM segmenters. Our model matches strong vision-only segmenters on familiar categories and improves transfer to real open-world anomalies, reaching 69.4% mean vulnerability-rank recall versus 57.1% for the best vision-only baseline and 53.9% for the best prompted VLM baseline. These results show that VLM image tokens provide useful semantic cues for transferring driving attributes to objects outside the training vocabulary.
Yuchen Zhang, Yuan Gao, Sebastian Schmidt et al.· 0 citations
Ensuring the safety of autonomous driving is a critical challenge. Scenario-based testing is a systematic process used to validate Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs), but it remains a fragmented modular pipeline in which scenario generation, retrieval, modification, ADS execution, and results analysis are performed by separate tools with little interaction. Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise across ADS sub-systems such as perception, planning, and control. However, no prior work covers the whole scenario-based testing pipeline for ADSs with a unified LLM-agent framework. We present PlannerForge, an LLM-agent framework that extends all scenario-based testing stages (from Scenario Generation to ADS Assessment) and adds two further LLM-enhanced stages: ADS Enhancement and ADS Benchmarking. We evaluate PlannerForge with 10 off-the-shelf LLMs across all tasks (Generation, Selection, Modification, Module Routing, Planner Testing, and Enhancement) under 5 prompt conditions. Best-per-task scores range from 0.88 to 1.00, and open-source 20-35B backends match commercial APIs on most tasks. Open-source models such as Qwen3.6:35B match commercial APIs on three of the five tasks. Chaining the modules end-to-end retains 83% / 78% of seed queries (commercial / open). It outperforms Scenario Factory 2.0 (Finkeldei et al., 2025) on natural-language generation (193 vs. 144 executable of 200) and realises 92-96% of requested city, road and vehicle attributes. It outperforms BM25 (Robertson and Zaragoza, 2009) at rank 1 selection (92.0% vs. 67.5%) and From-Words-to-Collisions (Gao et al., 2025) on physically valid edits (>=94% vs. 31%). At N=400, cost-tuning lifts planner success from 50.4% to 70.2% and cuts collisions from 19.0% to 8.4%, without domain-specific fine-tuning.
Yuan Gao, Sebastian Müller, Mattia Piccinini et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
