Skip to content

Author

Yu-Wei Gui

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Fast Adaptive Reactive-Power Compensation Control for Renewable Power Plants Considering Dynamic Active-Power–Voltage Coupling

Renewable power plants connected to low-system-strength grids are increasingly dominated by inverter-based resources (IBRs). Their point of common coupling (PCC) voltage is therefore shaped not only by reactive-power support but also by active-power ramps, network impedance, short-circuit capacity, and converter limits. Conventional Q-V droop control, fixed power-factor control, Volt/VAR control, and fixed active-power/reactive-power (P/Q) decoupling schemes often absorb active-power excursions into the voltage error, which can drive excessive reactive-power injection during fault clearing, post-fault power recovery, and phase-angle disturbances. Here, an active-power–voltage-coupling-aware reactive-power compensation (APVQ-RC) method is proposed for plant-level voltage control. The method estimates local P-V and Q-V voltage sensitivities online, reconstructs an effective voltage error, and produces a capacity-constrained reactive-power reference through smooth coupling activation. The reduced-order evaluation includes estimator conditioning, excitation screening, sensitivity-estimation error and empirical 95% estimator-error intervals, sensitivity to the smoothing factor and window length, measurement noise, converter capability saturation, and computational timing. Under P-V-coupled transients, APVQ-RC reduces voltage overshoot and reactive-power compensation energy while retaining Q-V-like support during voltage-sag-dominated events. Compared with the best scanned fixed P/Q baseline, it reduces overshoot, reactive-power compensation energy, and reactive-power peak by 42.03%, 60.35%, and 8.90%, respectively; the representative single-step calculation time is 0.0188 ms within a 1 ms control cycle. These results indicate millisecond-scale plant-level feasibility within the reduced model, while electromagnetic-transient, hardware-in-the-loop, and field validation remain necessary before deployment.

Jia-Cheng Li, Chang Ye, Meng-Han Xiao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.