Skip to content

Author

Yu-Tao Wu

We have 5 of 19 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

VEX-Bench: Benchmarking Verification Complexity of LLM-Generated Misinformation

The VEX-Bench is introduced, a unified benchmark for evaluating the verification complexity of LLM-generated misinformation, as perceived during screening, across models and generation methods, and shows that no single method dominates all dimensions, underscoring the need for multi-dimensional evaluation.

Hanxun Huang, Yu-Tao Wu, Qi-Zhou Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Just Ask Jev: Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions as a Zero-Shot Detector of AI Alignment Failures

RLCDAlignBench is presented, which benchmarks Jev on ten alignment failures: sycophancy, jailbreaks, deception, prompt injection, hallucination, privacy violation, social bias, reward hacking, concealing uncertainty, and power seeking.

Ruo-Qi Guo, Yi Liu, Ge-Lei Deng et al. · 6 citations

AgentHazard: A Benchmark for Evaluating Harmful Behavior in Computer-Use Agents

The benchmark evaluates whether agents can recognize and interrupt harm arising from accumulated context, repeated tool use, intermediate actions, and dependencies across steps, and indicates that current systems remain highly vulnerable.

Yun-Hao Feng, Yifan Ding, Ying-Shui Tan et al. · 18 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

HazardAuditor: From Executable Threats to Safer Computer-Use Agents

HazardAuditor is introduced, an execution-grounded framework that runs heterogeneous agents in controlled environments and normalizes their interactions into a canonical event representation for cross-framework supervision, and observes that token-level post-training objectives create a structural mismatch for generati...

Yun-Hao Feng, Rui-Xiao Lin, Ming Wen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Apr 2026

When Direct Prediction Fails: Evidence from LLM-Based Misinformation Risk Evaluation

The results suggest that directly asking for the target response may not always yield the most effective score for predicting it, and that comparing direct scores with indirect paths through related judgments may reveal a more effective predictive route.

Zonghuan Xu, Xiang Zheng, Yu-Tao Wu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.