We present a new generic transformation from weak PRFs computable in depth $d(n) = \Omega(\log n)$ to strong PRFs computable in depth $O(d(n))$. This construction refines the classical tree-based paradigm of GGM by {tapering} the internal state so the per-level depth decreases geometrically. We complement the above with new depth-efficient weak PRF constructions based on various standard assumptions. As a corollary, we obtain new $\mathsf{NC}^1$-computable PRFs from various classical assumptions, resolving several long-standing open problems. Concretely, for the first time, we obtain $\mathsf{NC}^1$-computable PRFs: (1) from the \textbf{Learning With Errors (LWE)} assumption with a polynomial modulus-to-noise ratio, improving upon prior low-depth constructions that required Ring-LWE with super-polynomial ratios [Banerjee-Peikert-Rosen, EUROCRYPT 2012]; (2)from the standard \textbf{Learning Parity with Noise (LPN)} assumption, removing the need for structured LPN variants [Boyle et al., FOCS 2020], [Ding-Jain-Komargodski, STOC 2025]; (3) from the \textbf{Computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH)} assumption; prior works relied on the stronger Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) or generalized Diffie-Hellman (GDH) assumptions [Naor-Reingold, FOCS'97, J. ACM'04].
Youlong Ding, Aayush Jain, Ilan Komargodski· 0 citations
We consider the following problems: Given two $n \times n$ tables defining binary operations $+$ and $\cdot$ on a set $S$ of $n$ elements, decide whether $(S,+,\cdot)$ forms a ring or, respectively, a field. Recently, Dudek, Fischer, Gokaj, Jin, K\"unnemann, Mao, and Redzic (STOC 2026) obtained the following two (near-)optimal results: (1) A randomized $O(n^2\log(1/\delta))$-time algorithm for verifying rings. (2) A deterministic $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for verifying fields. Their algorithms build on machinery of Evra, Gadot, Klein, and Komargodski (FOCS 2024), which relies on Classification of Finite Simple Groups (CFSG). In this work, we give a deterministic $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for ring verification, resolving the deterministic complexity of this problem. As a corollary, we also obtain a deterministic $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for field verification. Our algorithms are elementary and avoid CFSG machinery entirely.
Youlong Ding· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.