Skip to content

Author

Xinwei Qiang

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Book Open access Jul 2026

FluxZK: Scalable and Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proof Computation via GPU Acceleration

Zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zkSNARKs) are a key technology to privacy-preserving applications today. The complexity of proof generation, however, heavily constrains throughput in latency-sensitive environments. The computational burden primarily stems from two fundamental algorithms: Multi-Scalar Multiplication (MSM) and the Number Theoretic Transform (NTT). We propose a series of optimizations for these two kernels, including computation-transfer pipelining, load balancing, and memory access fusion, achieving 1.97 × to 2.16 × proof generation speedup over a state-of-the-art open source GPU acceleration library. Our design also supports out-of-core computation, enabling the generation of large-scale ZKP proofs.

Xinwei Qiang, Liukun Yu, Xiyu Wang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Parallel Blindness: Information Floors and Model Gaps in Block Drafting

Block drafters propose several tokens in one forward pass, before earlier target tokens are realised. Their rejection mixes two losses: missing within-block path information and imperfect modelling of observable information. Accepted length cannot distinguish them. We separate the two with an information floor, the minimum expected rejection at a specified conditioning order; rejection above this floor is the model gap. Estimating both from target rollouts across four domains, four open-weight targets, and a frontier API target yields three findings. First, the all-parallel floor reaches $0.286$ at the final slot on Qwen3-4B, limiting even the best proposal to $71\%$ per-slot acceptance. Second, one realised token removes $86$--$100\%$ of this floor, a locality also recovered by an independent mutual-information analysis. Third, current drafters remain far above their floors: the final-slot model gap accounts for $43$--$64\%$ of DFlash rejection and $85$--$92\%$ of DSpark's oracle-conditioned rejection. These findings separate the value of short-range conditioning from proposal quality.

Xinwei Qiang, Xiang Fang, Changli Chen et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.