Partial differential equations (PDEs) underpin the modeling of many natural and engineered systems. It can be convenient to express such models as neural PDEs (NPDEs) rather than using traditional numerical PDE solvers by replacing part or all of the PDE’s governing equations with a neural network representation. NPDEs are often easier to differentiate, linearize, reduce, or use for uncertainty quantification than the original numerical solver. They are usually trained on solution trajectories obtained by long-horizon rollout of the PDE solver. Here we propose a more sample-efficient data-augmentation strategy for generating NPDE training data from a computer model—specifically, one using an explicit, structured-grid finite-difference numerical solver—by space-filling sampling of local ‘stencil’ states. This approach removes a large degree of spatiotemporal redundancy present in trajectory data and oversamples states that may be rarely visited but help the NPDE generalize across the state space. We demonstrate that accurate NPDE stencil operators can be learned from augmented stencil training data generated by the computational equivalent of 10 timesteps’ worth of numerical simulation. Accuracy is further improved if a single full-trajectory simulation from the computer model is available, which is typically the case in practice. Across several PDE systems, we show that our data-augmented stencil data yield better trained neural stencil operators, with clear performance gains compared with naïvely sampled stencil data from simulation trajectories. Finally, using only 10 solver timesteps’ worth of augmented stencil data—with no full-trajectory simulation—our approach already matches or outperforms traditional ML emulators trained on hundreds to thousands of full trajectories in long-horizon rollout accuracy and stability. Reusing a single full trajectory within the same training budget further improves accuracy.
Sanket R. Jantre, Deepak Akhare, Zhiyuan Wang et al.· Machine Learning: Science an...· 0 citations
LLM powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have emerged as a promising paradigm for complex tasks. However, their advantages over single-agent systems (SAS) remain unclear, with performance varying inconsistently across settings. Here, we provide an information bottleneck perspective on elucidating the differences between MAS and SAS. Specifically, our key observation is that a SAS accumulates its full reasoning trace in one shared context, while a MAS uses isolated local contexts connected by bounded relay messages. We show that, under infinite relay bandwidth, any SAS can be simulated by a MAS that transmits the full upstream context. Thus, the nontrivial advantage of MAS arises under bounded relays, where compression introduces a fundamental trade-off: reducing redundant context can improve efficiency, but may also incur loss of task-relevant information. We formalize this trade-off as an information bottleneck controlled by an effective parameter $\beta$, which captures how the balance shifts with model capability, and shows that MAS gains arise when context reduction outweighs relay information loss. We conduct 18 controlled experiments across five benchmarks and three model scales to validate our theoretical studies. We observe that MAS consistently helps when relays are near-sufficient, especially for weaker models. In contrast, MAS gains shrink or reverse when relays incur information loss, especially for stronger models that can already extract useful information from redundant context and thus gain little from compression. Our study shows that multi-agent design is fundamentally an information-bottleneck optimization problem. This perspective explains when bounded inter-agent communication helps or hurts.