2 papers indexed here
We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
This work characterize the intervening regime in which the perturbation radius is proportional to the GD step, and identifies sufficient response regimes: differentiating training is a choice of perturbation resolution as well as a choice of derivative.
Gradient descent (GD) is explicit Euler for gradient flow, but a state-accurate continuous-time surrogate need not remain accurate after differentiation. At every fixed nonresonant step size, ordinary automatic differentiation exactly differentiates the executed hard-ReLU GD program. We prove that, over a fixed finite horizon, the GD states converge and these exact discrete derivatives approach an event-free regional propagator, whereas the derivative of the limiting flow also contains speed-normalized activation-event transfers. A prepoint Stieltjes representation separates the absolutely continuous regional Hessian from atomic interface curvature; one nonzero gradient jump produces an exactly rank-one endpoint discrepancy, and global convexity prevents complete multi-event cancellation whenever an event is strict. Nevertheless, a standard family of globally 1-strongly convex residual-ReLU squared-loss risks realizes arbitrarily large reciprocal sensitivity ratios on open initialization sets, with a uniform transversality margin. The same discrete-versus-flow decomposition extends to parameters and reverse-mode adjoints; resolved smoothing in the scalar or autonomous-normal regime and consistent event localization recover the flow sensitivity. The results concern deterministic full-batch, finite-horizon dynamics with a stable finite itinerary of separated same-direction transverse events; they are consistency theorems, not prevalence claims for large-scale training.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
