Skip to content

Author

Xiao-Shi Deng

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access 2026

Correlation-Aware Dynamic-Price-Feedback Ordered Charging for Vehicle–Grid Coordination

: Random vehicle arrivals, heterogeneous charging demands, and the station-level limit on aggregate electric vehicle (EV) charging power pose simultaneous challenges to event-driven ordered charging in terms of causal information constraints, charging economics, and aggregate-load coordination. Existing full-information multiobjective methods generally rely on the complete daily EV set and iterative solution procedures, whereas fixed time-of-use pricing or single-objective load-smoothing strategies cannot continuously adapt to vehicle arrival events. Moreover, preserving only the marginal distributions of charging-behavior variables may neglect their joint dependence, thereby affecting consistency between scenario generation and scheduling evaluation. To address these issues, this paper proposes Correlation-Aware Dynamic-Price-Feedback Ordered Charging for Vehicle–Grid Coordination (CDPFOC). CDPFOC uses a Gaussian Copula to generate representative scenarios that preserve the joint dependence structure of charging behaviors. It forms event-level economic feedback through a Dynamic Feedback Module (DFM), implements load balancing through an Adaptive Load-Envelope Module (ALM), and updates only the unexecuted future charging plans of vehicles that have arrived and remain online. Monte Carlo experiments in four representative scenarios show that, under a unified real-time dynamic settlement price and a 9 MW station-level EV aggregate charging-power hard limit, CDPFOC records either the lowest dynamic settlement cost or a tie for the lowest in all scenarios. Relative to uncontrolled charging, it reduces the dynamic settlement cost by 0.36%–18.68% and the peak-to-valley difference (PV) by 1.73%–17.55%, while attaining a 100.00% schedulable energy delivery rate and zero station-level capacity violations. Ablation results further indicate that the DFM primarily provides economic guidance, whereas the ALM primarily suppresses charging-power concentration; together, they coordinate charging economics and load smoothing without using individual information from vehicles that have not yet arrived.

Li-Xiao Wang, Jia-Qi Li, Hai-Feng Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.