Skip to content

Author

V. Caponio

We have 4 of 141 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Nov 2026

Oral Erythroplakia: Past, present and future aspects.

BACKGROUND To critically review the current evidence on oral erythroplakia (OE), a rare but clinically significant oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD), with particular emphasis on its malignant transformation rate, diagnostic challenges, and controversies surrounding its classification and management. MATERIAL...

A. Lorenzo-Pouso, M. Gómez-Rivas, V. Caponio et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access Oct 2026

Accuracy of transfer learning in predicting peri-implantitis onset from intraoral radiograph: A multi-center longitudinal retrospective study

The growing application of artificial intelligence in dentistry has opened new opportunities for predicting peri-implantitis (PI) using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Transfer learning, where knowledge from a model pre-trained on a large dataset is adapted to a new, domain-specific task, may enhance performance,...

M. Saleh, Luigi Nibali, A. Alrmali et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Hybrid Funnel Technique Reduces Marginal Bone Loss Versus Conventional Drilling: A 3‐Year, Prospective, Non‐randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

HFT demonstrated superior preservation of marginal bone over 3 years, suggesting that reduction of cortical compression during osteotomy provides a biological advantage, and implant site preparation remains a key determinant of long‐term peri‐implant bone stability.

L. Canullo, Yaniv Mayer, Federica Mattalia et al. · 0 citations
Clinical trial Open access Aug 2026

Bone regeneration after transcrestal sinus lift using nanoscale super-hydrophilic versus standard implant surfaces: a single-center, 12-month, parallel controlled clinical trial

Within the limitations of this study, implants with a nanoscale super-hydrophilic surface did not result in significantly greater bone regeneration than conventional moderately rough implants following transcrestal sinus floor elevation, although a trend toward increased bone volume was observed.

L. Canullo, D. Baldi, P. Pesce et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.